00:00:21 <Cheibriados> 03advil02 07[mutation_cleanup] * 0.20-a0-946-ged8219e: Fix lua formatting, tabs 10(41 seconds ago, 1 file, 65+ 52-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/ed8219e3fc77
00:01:14 <gammafunk> $ wc -l *.cc *.h | grep total
00:01:14 <gammafunk> 418524 total
00:01:14 <gammafunk> $ find dat -name '*.lua' | xargs wc -l | grep total
00:01:14 <gammafunk> 17113 total
00:01:14 <gammafunk> $ find dat -name '*.des' | xargs wc -l | grep total
00:01:16 <gammafunk> 133091 total
00:01:24 <gammafunk> how many lines we have currently of the various "source" files
00:01:56 <gammafunk> excluding things like util and monster etc
00:02:40 <advil> heh, nearly half of that lua is qw
00:02:43 <advil> er
00:02:45 <advil> 1/3
00:02:55 <gammafunk> is qw saved as qw.lua?
00:02:56 <gammafunk> or qw.rc
00:03:00 <advil> qw.rc
00:03:02 <advil> in test/stress
00:03:03 <gammafunk> if latter it's not counted
00:03:06 <advil> ah
00:03:06 <amalloy> 1/3 is nearly 1/2
00:03:33 <gammafunk> looks only for ".lua" files; but yeah some data probably should be included in that data (just now qw)
00:03:41 <gammafunk> also some of des is actually lua
00:04:03 <gammafunk> but this is a little harder to count accurately
00:04:32 <Brannock> jesus, advil
00:04:36 <Brannock> this is beyond what I could even conceive to do
00:04:40 <Brannock> good work
00:04:51 <advil> it's definitely beyond what I planned to do originally, that's for sure
00:05:09 <Brannock> really good work
00:05:38 <advil> well, let me do more testing before you say that too strongly :-)
00:06:03 <advil> Brannock: one thing that might interest you is that there's code in the lua to simulate mut potions, which you can run with many iterations and see what it tends to produce
00:06:10 <Brannock> oh good
00:06:19 <Brannock> I was looking onto hacking with mutation further and that might be nice
00:06:28 <Brannock> but we do need more mutations, overall, before I think we can get to an ideal state
00:06:31 <gammafunk> I need to return to transporters soon; I think I'm going to make a dozen or so little loot/encounter vaults, since I can imagine how to make those not too bad
00:07:07 <gammafunk> but I'd like to do a larger "layoutized" encompass that also works as D:15 and Depths (like how a few encompass work)
00:07:32 <gammafunk> there are a few issues about transporters; I think it might actually be better if monsters didn't path through them/uses them
00:08:09 <gammafunk> except when adjacent to the player; this would make them have a similar logic to stairs, where monsters can only use them if they're adjacent to you
00:08:48 <gammafunk> and I don't think there's too much benefit from having monsters track through them; it would make it trickier to use them for the kinds of encounters I'm going to do anyhow
00:15:58 <advil> sounds interesting
00:16:09 <advil> I guess because you stay on the same level, monsters won't necessarily be waiting in the way they are for stairs
00:17:00 <gammafunk> well, that is true, but the transporter is one-way
00:17:25 <gammafunk> the idea for many of these vaults is that you will transport in and there'll be a transporter out
00:17:31 <gammafunk> but not at the same location you arrived
00:17:44 <gammafunk> either that or stairs to another level
00:18:15 <gammafunk> my concern is more that for vaults with a transporter out, monsters waking up will leave through the transporter
00:18:35 <gammafunk> and I can't imagine too many interesting things happening by them just using them as they wander
00:18:40 <advil> ah, didn't realize they were one way
00:18:46 <advil> this is the more permanent golubria thing
00:19:01 <gammafunk> yeah, more because two-way isn't really too interesting
00:19:12 <advil> yeah, that makes total sense not to have monsters using them
00:19:48 <gammafunk> nothing says you can't make two one-way transporters that feed into each other to make a two-way, but generally that wouldn't do much gameplay-wise
00:20:38 <gammafunk> one thing I need to figure out
00:20:53 <gammafunk> for autoexplore, how does it know when it's safe to explore with a monster in LOS but behind a wall
00:21:37 <gammafunk> it seems to be using the pathfinder to see, based on travel cache, if the player knows for sure that there's no path to monster
00:22:17 <gammafunk> not really directly related but I noticed I can explore past some encased monsters in decor vaults
00:22:28 <gammafunk> but not in others, and I think it's due to map knowledge
00:23:20 <gammafunk> also, sad news
00:23:32 <gammafunk> I tried to do a playthrough of linley crawl 1.04f
00:23:49 <gammafunk> it crashes sometimes when kobolds throw darts at me (presumeably due to linley code?)
00:23:59 <johnstein> you should submit a PR
00:24:04 <gammafunk> not sure how stable this version was
00:24:13 <advil> how did you even get it to compile?
00:24:18 <gammafunk> I didn't!
00:24:43 <gammafunk> for behold, the ~*~*~ Linley Crawl FTP SITE ~*~*~ ftp://ftp.dungeoncrawl.org/
00:24:52 <gammafunk> has binaries for various linley crawl versions
00:24:54 <advil> oh heh, yeah I saw that linked on reddit
00:25:28 <gammafunk> had to run some dos protected mode exe before running crawl
00:26:02 <gammafunk> did you know that the Priest role apparently just gets spells granted to it as it levels?
00:26:25 <gammafunk> it worships "the gods", you see (gods not implemented yet)
00:26:39 <gammafunk> also you can't train specific skills at all
00:26:59 <gammafunk> at least I can't see a way to, but Dodging as a skill does exist (and increase as you gain XP)
00:28:36 <travis-ci> The build failed. (mutation_cleanup - 63338c2 #8170 : advil): https://travis-ci.org/crawl/crawl/builds/218317867
00:29:37 <advil> huh, wonder what that's about
00:32:05 <Eksell> Unstable branch on CRAWL.XTAHUA.COM updated to: 0.20-a0-949-g916514f (34)
00:32:34 <advil> failed on one of the stress tests?
00:32:38 <amalloy> advil: looks like the last thing it tried to do was abyss_short_run
00:32:41 <advil> yeah
00:32:44 <amalloy> maybe got mutated in there
00:32:50 <amalloy> and found some exciting bug?
00:32:59 <advil> must be
00:34:23 <amalloy> looking at that file now, i am amused it starts with a comment explaining why it's testing a MuBe instead of MuCK. it's just taken for granted that the reader will expect that we would be testing MuCK instead
00:36:38 <advil> yeah I can get it to crash with a wretched star
00:38:55 <advil> huh, that's what I get for adding asserts
00:39:07 <advil> I think it does reveal that bookkeeping for wretched stars wasn't done right
00:40:04 <advil> which might explain one of the weird saves I have
00:42:57 <amalloy> advil: the player's level in a mutation can never be negative, is i'm guessing the assert you triggered?
00:43:04 <advil> no
00:43:34 <advil> wretched stars use RANDOM_CORRUPT_MUTATION to add multiple temporary mutation levels at a time
00:43:50 <advil> I had an assert that assumed that only 1 temp level at a time was ever added
00:44:02 <advil> based on the way the bookkeeping was done
00:53:12 <Cheibriados> 03advil02 07[mutation_cleanup] * 0.20-a0-947-g5ea7d72: Fix bookkeeping for corruption 10(58 seconds ago, 2 files, 20+ 5-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/5ea7d72ba31a
01:14:31 -!- amalloy_ is now known as amalloy
01:14:35 -!- tcsc_ is now known as tcsc
01:26:55 <alexjurkiewicz> !tell hellmonk I'd still like temple to appear in hellcrawl given how cool the maps are
01:26:56 <Sequell> alexjurkiewicz: OK, I'll let hellmonk know.
01:29:58 <amalloy> advil: i left a bunch of comments on https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/63338c279b70
01:30:26 <amalloy> not sure if that notifies you or what
01:41:58 <travis-ci> The build was fixed. (mutation_cleanup - 5ea7d72 #8171 : advil): https://travis-ci.org/crawl/crawl/builds/218328052
01:42:13 <advil> heh, in fact it sends me a distinct email for every one
01:42:27 <advil> wonder if there's a digest mode or something
01:42:30 <advil> thanks for the review
01:43:09 <amalloy> advil: if you'd created a PR you could have gotten a digest
01:43:19 <amalloy> but for drive-by comments on a commit, you get them all
01:46:23 <rumflump> !tell Brannock do you happen to know why the ratskin cloak rats appear to be durably summoned?
01:46:24 <Sequell> rumflump: OK, I'll let brannock know.
01:54:27 <amalloy> rumflump: what do you think they should be?
01:58:31 <rumflump> well, they don't stick around...
01:58:33 <amalloy> they are durably summoned because they shouldn't give xp (obviously), and Brannock evidently thought they shouldn't be abjured
01:58:34 <rumflump> so normal summons?
01:58:49 <amalloy> that's the difference between durable summon and normal summon
01:59:01 <amalloy> abjuration immunity
01:59:23 <rumflump> ah, wild. I've gotten durably summoned things from god wrath, and the sum effect *appeared* to be "this summon doesn't go away"
01:59:31 <amalloy> well
01:59:33 <rumflump> I never checked though, it just seemed obvious and true
01:59:51 <amalloy> technically it is possible to separate those two effects, but most durable summons are also permanent
02:00:00 <amalloy> maybe it is incorrect for ratskin to separate them
02:00:29 <amalloy> i can't think of anything else that does
02:00:58 <rumflump> yeah, me and the player that I'm spectating both thought the rats would be permanent. maybe enough to mention in the cloak and/or abil description that the summons are non permanent?
02:01:01 <alexjurkiewicz> maybe durably summoned shouldn't have any icon, or it should just say "no xp" rather than calling itself a summon type
02:03:54 <amalloy> rumflump: i think the idea that anything in the game could summon an unlimited number of permanent allies is implicitly impossible. calling it out specifically is silly. if there's confusion, it should be resolved by not explicitly saying "durable", not by explicitly saying "not durable"
02:05:03 <rumflump> true. it seemed plausible since they're only rats - but admittedly I didn't give it much thought, I just saw the little icon and assumed
02:06:30 <|amethyst> IMO ratskin rats should be displayed the same as S2S snakes
02:06:53 <|amethyst> those don't say "durably summoned", do they?
02:07:10 <amalloy> |amethyst: good comparison
02:12:13 <amalloy> |amethyst: how do we flavour the rats' departure, then? returning to the shadows of the dungeon or something?
02:19:36 <minmay> imo instead of being the ratskin cloak it should be a cloak literally made of rats, like a rat king except in the shape of a cloak
02:19:52 <minmay> and when you evoke +rats youre grabbing a ball of rats off the cloak and throwing it
02:20:21 <|amethyst> but fortunately they continue to breed so it doesn't run out
02:20:32 <Cheibriados> 03amalloy02 07* 0.20-a0-950-g92a50c4: Mark ratskin cloak's summons correctly (rumflump, |amethyst) 10(62 seconds ago, 2 files, 6+ 2-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/92a50c4e500a
02:29:27 <rumflump> incidentally, the "monkeys on a keyboard can produce intelligent results" thing? I just made a username, expecting it to come out as awiofket or the like, but I mashed the keyboard as usual and got "waned"
02:40:03 <amalloy> |amethyst: can you think of any cases that would trigger https://github.com/crawl/crawl/blob/master/crawl-ref/source/mon-death.cc#L1887-L1888 ? i'd like to make monster_die just take a monster& instead of a monster* but it's called so often i don't know how to prove it's actually safe
02:40:39 <ProzacElf> the monkeys win again!
02:41:33 <ProzacElf> minmay: like the rat king in discworld that is a bunch of rats with their tails tied together that gain some weird psychic power via that?
02:41:44 <ProzacElf> and have some sort of descriptor that is escaping me
02:42:48 <ProzacElf> also, i think ratskin cloak is cool, even if the rats are largely useless by the time you have the evo to reliably summon a lot of decent ones
02:42:58 <rumflump> cranium rats
02:43:23 <ProzacElf> oh, what were the rats in torment called?
02:43:38 <rumflump> no that's from torment
02:43:51 <rumflump> I was just hoping to get lucky and they were named the same in discworld
02:43:51 <ProzacElf> ah
02:43:52 <ProzacElf> haha
02:44:01 <ProzacElf> might be why i thought of torment then
02:44:10 <ProzacElf> but no, they weren't cranium rats in discworld
02:44:35 <ProzacElf> they were just rats
02:45:31 <ProzacElf> oh
02:45:38 <ProzacElf> "rat king" is actually the term
02:45:41 <ProzacElf> apparently
02:45:45 <ProzacElf> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rat_king
03:10:13 <Jorgrell> Unstable branch on crawl.jorgrun.rocks updated to: 0.20-a0-950-g92a50c4 (34)
03:24:54 <Rotatell> Unstable branch on crawl.beRotato.org updated to: 0.20-a0-950-g92a50c4 (34)
03:28:24 <Cheibriados> 03amalloy02 07* 0.20-a0-951-ga19df7c: Add some parens around a macro argument 10(68 seconds ago, 1 file, 5+ 5-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/a19df7c6b35d
03:33:38 <Cheibriados> New branch created: pull/507 (1 commit) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/pull/507
03:33:38 <Cheibriados> 03amalloy02 07https://github.com/crawl/crawl/pull/507 * 0.20-a0-952-g866c464: Make monster_die take a monster& instead of a monster* 10(39 minutes ago, 32 files, 310+ 311-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/866c464a52a4
04:10:07 <Jorgrell> Unstable branch on crawl.jorgrun.rocks updated to: 0.20-a0-951-ga19df7c (34)
04:10:26 <gammafunk> "Die &monster, you don't const in this world!"
04:10:34 <gammafunk> ^ credit me if you use this
05:01:02 -!- amalloy is now known as amalloy_
07:09:18 -!- dexap is now known as paxed
10:00:45 -!- Palyth_ is now known as Palyth
10:21:59 <Cheibriados> Ash Scrying detects monsters outside LOS 13https://crawl.develz.org/mantis/view.php?id=10996 by Le_Nerd
10:31:09 <rumflump> do summoning staves still abjure on hit?
10:40:06 <advil> !source player::max_stat
10:40:06 <Sequell> 1/1. https://github.com/crawl/crawl/blob/master/crawl-ref/source/player-stats.cc#L70
10:40:30 <advil> the docstring here implies it should consider all mutations with base=true, but _stat_modifier looks only at innate mutations
10:40:34 <advil> wonder which is correct
10:41:32 <advil> seems like the docstring should be, but I really have no idae
10:41:38 <Lasty> rumflump: no
10:41:44 <advil> *idea
10:42:27 <rumflump> !learn edit staff of summoning[1 s/ and.*skill//
10:42:28 <Sequell> staff of summoning[1/1]: Enhances Summoning spells. Also provides a level of warding.
10:43:13 <advil> in fact, are there even any innate stat mutations?
10:44:14 <Lasty> advil: like species ones? ni
10:44:15 <Lasty> no
10:44:25 <advil> yeah, that's what I mean
10:44:33 <advil> do you know if there were at some point?
10:45:09 <advil> maybe MUT_STRONG_STIFF
10:47:37 <Lasty> not that I know of. Maybe demonspawn could get some?
10:47:56 <Lasty> stats don't make sense as racials
10:48:09 <Lasty> since they already have settings for that
10:52:48 <advil> hmm MUT_THIN_SKELETAL_STRUCTURE increases dex actually
10:53:00 <advil> looks like there are a few obsolete ones as well
10:53:34 <advil> rough black scales
10:54:09 <advil> I did mean to include ds muts in "innate" (since they're all lumped together with species muts)
10:55:51 <Lasty> ah!
10:57:13 <rumflump> if thin skel is the final remaining one, are you thinking of a change? perhaps you can score some millimarvins
10:57:32 <advil> no, I'm just trying to clean up mutation stuff
10:57:52 <advil> though I don't know if thing skeletal structure is the greatest ds mut
10:58:14 <advil> I'm still running off millimarvins from the LO deletion thing :-)
10:58:27 <rumflump> ??thing skeletal structure
10:58:27 <Sequell> thing skeletal structure ~ thin skeletal structure[1/1]: Dex +2/4/6 Stealth +25/50/75
10:58:52 -!- zkyp_ is now known as zkyp
11:01:55 <rumflump> that's a "scales" mut right?
11:02:24 <advil> yes
11:10:11 <Lasty> advil: it's not, but the stealth+ is kinda nice
11:10:34 <Lasty> It's not the worst, I'd say
11:10:52 <Lasty> probably the best has to be the +EV one, since it also gives rMsl at the top end
11:11:46 <advil> yeah, it's not terrible, iirc once I had nightstalker + thin skeleton which was great
11:14:27 <rumflump> think a PR to make thinskel give EV instead of dex would go anywhere?
11:16:35 <advil> my guess is it would probably be too (i.e. slightly more) similar to repulsion field
11:17:33 <rumflump> ??scales facet
11:17:33 <Sequell> I don't have a page labeled scales_facet in my learndb.
11:29:41 <advil> is there any sort of crawlcode convention for when something is an instance method vs a global function? I ask b/c it seems like this is done a lot less than I might have expected, but this might just be history
11:53:49 <Lasty> advil: I have not been able to discerne a pattern. My preference would be for instance methods where they make sense
12:00:20 <advil> yeah, that's what I prefer too
12:17:51 <advil> ^dc DrunkenThon
12:17:58 <advil> ^rc DrunkenThon
12:17:59 <Sequell> http://crawl.berotato.org/crawl/rcfiles/crawl-git/DrunkenThon.rc
12:18:12 <advil> !rc DrunkenThon
12:18:13 <Sequell> http://crawl.akrasiac.org/rcfiles/crawl-git/DrunkenThon.rc
12:43:04 <MarvinPA> huh i wonder if that scrying bug is barachi-related
12:45:34 <amalloy> probably
12:50:00 <MarvinPA> looks like it was already broken for nightstalker characters before the existence of barachi, maybe
12:50:23 <MarvinPA> in that you can see stuff out past range 4 while scrying too
12:53:05 <MarvinPA> ah it's just get_nearby_monsters that does it wrong by the look of it, so only the monster list leaks info and everything else is handled correctly
12:56:42 <amalloy> MarvinPA: it looks to me like for nightstalker chars ash lets you detect (not scry) items/monster outside of radius 4
12:56:51 <amalloy> not sure if that is a surprise
12:57:27 <amalloy> er
12:57:34 <MarvinPA> yeah, i think that's fine
12:57:46 <amalloy> what i mean is, before barachim that was true. now, of course, as you say it's broken for scry too
12:58:58 <MarvinPA> i guess it'd maybe be fine to let scrying go out to radius 7 if you have <7 los but at the moment it's buggy and inconsistent (and it'd make it even harder to tell whether things are in "real" vision)
13:03:51 <MarvinPA> i guess barachi made a bunch of things work differently in weird ways?
13:04:40 <MarvinPA> like being abyssed brings an 8x8 area into the abyss for all species now instead of 7x7, monsters get distracted by gold that's out at range 8 under gozag
13:06:20 <amalloy> MarvinPA: yes, there are a number of uses of LOS_RADIUS that should be fixed
13:06:58 <amalloy> i disagree with the comment on that saying some brave soul should find/replace with LOS_MAX_RADIUS or whatever; all uses should be audited to determine what they should actually check
13:09:43 <Cheibriados> 03amalloy02 07* 0.20-a0-952-gd383355: Add a getter for los_radius 10(44 seconds ago, 5 files, 11+ 4-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/d383355ad0cb
13:10:51 <MarvinPA> seems like a pain yeah
13:15:13 <amalloy> MarvinPA: another example: it looks like qazlal's ab works on clouds at distance 8? but i can't quite figure out how to place a friendly cloud at that distance, since you generally can't reach out of LOS and clouds out there dissipate fast anyway
13:15:32 <MarvinPA> yeah, i was looking at that one too briefly
13:16:04 <MarvinPA> and it only works at all on friendly clouds now right? instead of placing hostiles from monster clouds
13:16:17 <amalloy> yeah
13:18:37 <MarvinPA> i guess it's just an ash buff generally, letting everyone detect monsters passively up to range 8
13:22:22 <amalloy> passively? i thought this only worked for scrying
13:22:49 <MarvinPA> it's broken separately for passive detection :P
13:22:55 <MarvinPA> !source player_monster_detect_radius
13:22:56 <Sequell> 1/1. https://github.com/crawl/crawl/blob/master/crawl-ref/source/player.cc#L7595
13:22:57 <amalloy> it is? it seems okay for me
13:23:08 <MarvinPA> you need 160 piety
13:23:17 <amalloy> i have 200
13:23:43 <amalloy> oh, i bet i know
13:24:15 <amalloy> MarvinPA: monster detection doesn't work when time is stopped for wizmode
13:24:16 <amalloy> apparently
13:24:21 <MarvinPA> aha
13:24:51 <amalloy> i was trying to ensure monsters wouldn't disrupt my LOS measurements by moving around...
13:25:36 <amalloy> detecting monsters at range 8 seems like a pretty strong buff
13:25:55 <amalloy> since it enables you to avoid entering their LOS at all, if you are trying to minimize conflict
13:25:57 <Lasty> amalloy: use stationary monsters?
13:26:17 <amalloy> Lasty: how would you place a stationary monster that's not yet in LOS
13:26:33 <Lasty> couldn't you place one then leave los?
13:26:43 <amalloy> the goal was testing ash monster detection
13:27:03 <amalloy> this is a rhetorical question; i know it's possible but it's not worth the trouble
13:27:08 <Lasty> ah
13:28:02 <Henzell> Unstable branch on crawl.akrasiac.org updated to: 0.20-a0-951-ga19df7c (34)
13:28:08 <amalloy> MarvinPA: are you planning to do the LOS_RADIUS audit?
13:28:23 <MarvinPA> i'm just fixing these two ash things right now
13:28:43 <MarvinPA> might come back to the rest of it later but if you'd like to fix some, go for it :P
13:30:36 <amalloy> MarvinPA: okay. at least edit the comment on LOS_RADIUS so that if neither of us gets to it, anyone who sees the todo will do the right thing instead of the wrong thing?
13:31:13 <MarvinPA> sure
13:37:39 <Cheibriados> 03MarvinPA02 07* 0.20-a0-953-g5e11c12: Fix Ashenzari passive monster detection range 10(12 minutes ago, 1 file, 1+ 1-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/5e11c120209b
13:37:39 <Cheibriados> 03MarvinPA02 07* 0.20-a0-954-g2ca7e2b: Unbrace 10(11 minutes ago, 1 file, 0+ 2-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/2ca7e2b0430d
13:37:39 <Cheibriados> 03MarvinPA02 07* 0.20-a0-955-g7bb5b86: Fix a monster list info leak when scrying 10(11 minutes ago, 3 files, 4+ 3-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/7bb5b86b04cb
13:38:36 <MarvinPA> i like the doubly-out-of-date comment on species vision range
13:39:00 <MarvinPA> firstly that all species have the same vision range, and secondly that it's default 8
13:58:59 <Cheibriados> 03MarvinPA02 07* 0.20-a0-956-gcdeeb85: Don't flash the screen when out-of-LOS monsters cast LOS spells (#10995) 10(4 minutes ago, 1 file, 2+ 1-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/cdeeb85f274f
14:09:27 <Jorgrell> Unstable branch on crawl.jorgrun.rocks updated to: 0.20-a0-956-gcdeeb85 (34)
14:19:46 <Cheibriados> Sticky flames works on ghosts created by lost souls 13https://crawl.develz.org/mantis/view.php?id=10997 by Lavandula
14:39:20 <Rotatell> ziggurnaut (L13 DgCj)  (Lair:4)
14:59:10 <Cheibriados> 03Lasty02 07* 0.20-a0-957-g47ad1fd: Remove the ability to cancel evoked invis prematurely. 10(7 minutes ago, 4 files, 37+ 25-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/47ad1fdc51cf
15:09:21 <Jorgrell> Unstable branch on crawl.jorgrun.rocks updated to: 0.20-a0-957-g47ad1fd (34)
16:24:43 <Rotatell> ziggurnaut (L13 HOSu)  (Lair:5)
18:15:46 <Lantell> Unstable branch on underhound.eu updated to: 0.20-a0-957-g47ad1fd (34)
18:48:11 -!- mikee__ is now known as mikee
18:59:32 <Lasty> // There's probably a reason for this. I don't know it.
18:59:32 <Lasty> if (going_up)
18:59:32 <Lasty> seen_monsters_react();
18:59:52 <Lasty> // Dunno why this is on going down only.
18:59:52 <Lasty> if (!going_up)
18:59:52 <Lasty> {
18:59:52 <Lasty> moveto_location_effects(whence);
18:59:52 <Lasty> // Clear list of beholding and constricting/constricted monsters.
18:59:53 <Lasty> you.clear_beholders();
18:59:53 <Lasty> you.stop_constricting_all();
18:59:54 <Lasty> you.stop_being_constricted();
18:59:54 <Lasty> trackers_init_new_level(true);
18:59:55 <Lasty> }
18:59:56 <Lasty> good comments
19:00:30 <|amethyst> Lasty:  do you have the crawlcode password?
19:00:59 -!- n1k is now known as n1
19:02:17 <Lasty> |amethyst: nope
19:02:19 <|amethyst> Do you want it? :)
19:02:23 <Lasty> haha, sure
19:06:15 <Lasty> aaaand tweeter
19:06:18 <Lasty> *tweeted
19:13:42 -!- MIBE is now known as mibe
20:10:26 -!- amalloy is now known as amalloy_
20:48:19 -!- GiantOwl is now known as Kalir
21:27:02 -!- amalloy_ is now known as amalloy
21:47:50 <Cheibriados> 03advil02 07[mutation_cleanup] * 0.20-a0-948-gee82781: Incorporate amalloy's feedback 10(4 minutes ago, 64 files, 634+ 630-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/ee82781f6cc6
22:09:19 <Cheibriados> 03Lasty02 07[dpegs_dynamic_monsters] * 0.20-a0-967-gdcb5b96: Merge master 10(6 hours ago, 0 files, 0+ 0-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/dcb5b9619323
22:09:19 <Cheibriados> 03Lasty02 07[dpegs_dynamic_monsters] * 0.20-a0-968-g38af03e: Add multiple levels of bezotting 10(43 minutes ago, 5 files, 64+ 19-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/38af03eb2369
22:09:19 <Cheibriados> 03Lasty02 07[dpegs_dynamic_monsters] * 0.20-a0-969-g5a5da1e: Bezot monsters when you take stairs 10(2 minutes ago, 1 file, 9+ 0-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/5a5da1e99219
22:10:35 <Lasty> !tell dpeg check out my latest commits
22:10:35 <Sequell> Lasty: OK, I'll let dpeg know.
22:10:47 <Lasty> !tell dpeg in the dynamic monsters branch
22:10:47 <Sequell> Lasty: OK, I'll let dpeg know.
22:12:28 -!- amalloy is now known as amalloy_
22:22:21 <CanOfWorms> I hope someone stair dances V:5 and reports back
22:25:09 <minmay> I bet people would still do it
22:25:20 <minmay> stairdancing V:5 has been a bad idea for about 10 years and it's still the most popular strategy
22:25:34 <Rotatell> Experimental (dpegs_dynamic_monsters) branch on crawl.beRotato.org updated to: 0.20-a0-969-g5a5da1e
22:26:46 <johnstein> that answers the question I was going to ask this week on whether that was an active experimental still