00:20:07 <Discord|> <08n​icolae> 🤔 is there a particular reason why none of the shoal ending vaults have ilsuiw guarding the rune, she's always in another of the huts
00:31:50 <Discord|> <09g​ammafunk> Well, historically she generated in like most of shoals instances, so probably not much desire to see ilsuiw even more
00:31:59 <Discord|> <09g​ammafunk> she still generates pretty frequently
00:32:33 <Discord|> <09g​ammafunk> Not sure it's anything especially interesting to see her guarding the rune per se, I guess at least in part because it would increase her rate of generation
00:33:12 <Discord|> <09g​ammafunk> we did rework her placement so that it's not so common, some versions ago
00:49:50 <Discord|> <09h​ellmonk> really just want more shoals endings that arent huts
02:18:09 <Cbrotell> Unstable branch on cbro.berotato.org updated to: 0.27-a0-1193-g8631133539 (34)
03:30:42 <Kelbell> Fork (bcrawl) on crawl.kelbi.org updated to: 0.23-a0-4156-gf4fb8d8f3b
03:46:45 <Kelbell> Fork (bcadrencrawl) on crawl.kelbi.org updated to: 0.03-488-g041468d685
10:10:02 <Discord|> <06a​dvil> I don't think the question was about increasing placement, but why ilsuiw can only generate in huts that don't contain the rune
10:10:25 <Discord|> <06a​dvil> I sort of suspect this is not really a deeply intentional thing
12:04:20 <Discord|> <09g​ammafunk> oh, yeah
12:04:56 <Discord|> <09g​ammafunk> probably no good reason for a spoiler like that
12:16:11 <Discord|> <08n​icolae> mostly i was just thinking about making a series of shoals rune vaults (since shoals rune vaults are a little easier to design than other lair branches, which i have not yet made rune vaults for despite thinking about it a lot), and when looking at the existing ones i noticed that ilsuiw always gets her own hut in the serial vault but never gets placed in the rune hut
13:28:31 <advil> %git 7a858468532a2ed152b29ac8fcd902bc3e69ca7f
13:28:31 <Cheibriados> 07PleasingFungus02 * 0.27-a0-419-g7a85846: Fix @player_only@ messages (#9201) 10(3 months ago, 3 files, 39+ 6-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/7a858468532a
13:28:36 <advil> I don't think this is fixed?
13:28:44 <advil> nothing ever checks for @player_only@
13:29:04 <advil> there is code in _invalid_msg that checks for the presence of "you." and "You", but that's it
13:29:11 <advil> maybe I'm misunderstanding though?
13:30:07 <advil> well, tbc, *if* a message with @player_only@ is uttered at the player, that string gets removed
13:30:25 <advil> but as far as I can tell there is no check on those strings targeting a non-player foe
13:31:15 <advil> (turns out this is a lot easier to replicate if it is the player who is trying to speak all these lines)
13:33:20 <Discord|> <06a​dvil> oh hm it does seem to check for "@player"
13:36:52 <Discord|> <06a​dvil> ok nevermind I think I've gotten it to work, was just missing that partial match thing
15:01:09 <Discord|> <10P​leasingFungus> the relevant code is impossibly confusing
15:38:15 <Discord|> <06a​dvil> I noticed that
19:40:27 <Cheibriados> New branch created: pull/1961 (1 commit) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/pull/1961
19:40:27 <Cheibriados> 03Skrybe02 {GitHub} 07https://github.com/crawl/crawl/pull/1961 * 0.27-a0-1194-g84c4787: Update special_room_magic_class 10(30 minutes ago, 1 file, 14+ 13-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/84c478712b95