01:08:47 Stable branch on crawl.develz.org updated to: 0.25.0-46-gbd7b0854d2 (34) 01:38:14 Unstable branch on crawl.develz.org updated to: 0.26-a0-284-g73c0fb6129 (34) 02:16:28 nerf xomscumming please 03:11:46 Stable (0.25) branch on crawl.beRotato.org updated to: 0.25.0-46-gbd7b085 03:24:30 Unstable branch on crawl.beRotato.org updated to: 0.26-a0-284-g73c0fb6 (34) 03:31:42 Stable (0.25) branch on crawl.kelbi.org updated to: 0.25.0-46-gbd7b0854d2 03:47:38 Experimental (delpal) branch on crawl.kelbi.org updated to: 0.26-a0-306-g97a777e62f 03:50:22 Fork (bcrawl) on crawl.kelbi.org updated to: 0.23-a0-3439-g0cad18c694 04:04:39 Fork (gooncrawl) on crawl.kelbi.org updated to: 0.22-a0-997-g244edc0587 04:06:39 -!- bugsniper_ is now known as bug_sniper 05:09:05 -!- hayenne_ is now known as hayenne 09:23:04 -!- hayenne_ is now known as hayennne 09:23:06 -!- hayennne is now known as hayenne 09:41:03 lol just found a place where crawl uses *binary* fixed point, who knew 10:00:42 good find 10:29:02 advil: for some reason, I can't recreate my container when I try to start from scratch. I get an error running your build-testing-container.sh script due to rsyslog: http://dpaste.com/3E2SHK5 10:29:38 only change I've made is to rename the container, but it had that name before and I got through the chroot setup where it built crawl etc 10:29:47 oh, and I made it build 0.25 instead of 0.24 10:30:46 dpaste link has the error I get from the script 10:31:44 it's possible something has changed in ubuntu again 10:31:54 I really should make it test once a week instead of only on push 10:33:00 advil: well it worked when I ran it all of like 4 days ago 10:33:10 ah the real error is "Failure trying to run: chroot "/home/crawl/DGL" mount -t proc proc /proc" 10:33:23 the rsyslog thing is a consequence of that 10:33:28 still not sure why that would fail 10:33:42 is there something persisting that I'm not deleting? 10:35:25 I wouldn't think so but who knows 10:36:27 I do suspect something has changed, mounting proc didn't used to be needed for the debootstrap step 10:36:35 interesting 10:36:48 maybe I should just try to delete the instance and recreate it and see what happens 10:36:59 and it's one of the things that is sort of weird inside a container 10:37:20 that looked like a past of a full run of the scripts, was it not from scratch? 10:37:28 maybe I'm misunderstanding what you're doing 10:37:48 *paste 10:38:03 well, it's just a run of build-testing-container.sh 10:38:57 there's no prior step to run afaik; only thing I've done is delete any existing containers seen with docker container ls -a 10:39:39 so yeah, a full run of the scripts 10:39:43 ok, so it really should be building it from scratch already 10:39:55 yep 10:40:06 I was saying I could try deleting this lightsail instance and reprovisioning it 10:40:22 I sort of strongly suspect it would work since it worked the first time I ran your test script 10:40:52 just no idea why I can't rerun it (I'm only rerunning it so I can understand the process a bit better, since it had been some days since working on this) 10:41:49 the last time these scripts started failing it was because some details of the packages it was pulling had changed, which could happen at any time 10:42:34 although if lightsail is using a container behind the scenes then it's containers within containers within containers and there could be some mysterious interactions 10:42:44 specifically on things like proc 10:43:19 I can see if it works locally later today 10:44:20 ok, thanks 11:11:52 advil: looks like it's working when I run it on a newly provisioned instance 11:13:06 hm, strange 11:19:24 I really should have used tee to save the output of the container building script this time 11:50:34 New branch created: xom-is-bored (1 commit) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/tree/xom-is-bored 11:50:34 03advil02 07[xom-is-bored] * 0.26-a0-285-g08099fb: Let xom be bored by standing around 10(7 minutes ago, 6 files, 46+ 10-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/08099fb4158b 12:05:14 advil: looking at what happened, it seems the script didn't run successfully before; I got the chroot -> rsyslog error again, it's just that it didn't seem to run the intermediate container stuff (where it builds crawl etc) when I ran it again 12:08:35 hrm, I think despite that, it's working 12:11:51 indeed it is 12:13:07 oh 12:13:34 that sort of makes sense, it's not as if rsyslog is needed in the chroot 12:13:38 it must be a dep of something 12:13:44 the chroot package list is not very curated 12:15:02 a guess is that rsyslog needs /proc to be mounted, and it isn't mounted at that point in the script so it gives an error on install, but the error doesn't impact anything real because rsyslog is not important 12:15:48 good to know; still not sure where that cache was for the first part of the container building though 12:16:32 it seems this cache wasn't even a problem, but I was confused when it didn't go through the entire process of e.g. building crawl and 0.25 and all that other dgl setup stuff second time I ran it 12:16:55 I guess it's some kind of container building cache; I need to read a lot more about docker, obviously 12:19:18 I also need to figure out how to open up this server to the outside world; can see webtiles returning lobby output if I telnet from server to localhost 8080, but just adding a rule for 8080 from lightsail management wasn't enough 12:20:02 So are centaurs actually being removed? It doesn't sound like these Palentonga things are a "replacement", why not just add them without removing Centaurs? 12:20:08 are you actually running a docker container inside lightsail? 12:20:25 advil: yes 12:20:33 docker ports are weird (you usually have to use :0 and I still don't fully understand whyy), so it may be that 12:21:49 although if you can get to it when logged in maybe not 12:24:01 that might be a side effect of running docker on mac; i've never had that issue on linux 12:24:07 could be 12:25:26 Getting X-windows in Docker is a pain in the butt. 12:25:38 I never really figured it out. 12:52:58 The build passed. (xom-is-bored - 08099fb #13894 : advil): https://travis-ci.org/crawl/crawl/builds/707396287 13:28:54 Unstable branch on crawl.akrasiac.org updated to: 0.26-a0-284-g73c0fb6 (34) 13:49:31 -!- hayenne__ is now known as hayenne 16:14:29 advil: was able to get the container working publicly on my lightsail instance, both ssh and webtiles 16:14:37 once I figured out that I needed to start the container without specifying 127.0.0.1 in the publish argument, that is 16:15:19 otherwise I could only access those services from the host itself 16:16:46 hi, the archives https://crawl.develz.org/release/0.25/stone_soup-0.25.0.tar.xz and nodeps at https://crawl.develz.org/release/0.25/ have a bunch of OS X dotfiles in them that cause errors if not removed before compiling 16:16:53 `stone_soup-0.25.0/source/dat/des/arrival/._simple.des:1: syntax error` 16:17:33 the source link from http://crawl.develz.org/download.htm doesn't have them 16:17:50 I didn't test any other archives 16:19:11 kitchen_ace: thanks; you can make a github issue about that if you like, but we can take a look 16:20:08 will do 16:21:48 why are those os x related? 16:23:06 not immediately sure what would generate those 16:23:19 but it does probably mean that some git clean command would be needed 16:23:21 They're like OS X cache files or something? I don't know the right name for them. 16:23:42 I don't seem to have them on os x 16:24:40 they're binary files but the contents include strings "Mac OS X" and "com.apple.lastuseddate" 16:24:47 doh 16:25:03 preemptively blaming alexjurkiewicz 16:26:21 hm, seems like metadata that is used for when there's some unusual partition type tha doesn't support metadata directly 16:28:24 er, wait 16:28:47 those files weren't made by the release process 16:28:58 I might have built them 16:29:02 those must have been made...hrm 16:29:06 but I literally can't see the files in quesiton 16:29:09 yeah I was going to say 16:29:22 I would have copied those over when I installed the debs 16:29:30 but I don't recall copying them to the release folder 16:29:42 since I wouldn't need to and would just link to the source made by the release 16:30:12 if you're looking for the files on CDO itself, it's in ~/website/release 16:31:10 I'd sort of argue that these files shouldn't be published on CDO since that's what we do the release on github for 16:31:29 github doesn't currently generate the nodeps one though 16:31:35 which is what most linux package builders want 16:31:40 ah 16:33:02 (I don't see those files even if I download and open those archives, but this is a mac...) 16:33:11 oh yeah, they're definitely there 16:33:22 I downloaded the archive and uncompressed it on my machine 16:34:11 well, the ._simple.des file is there, at least 16:34:30 oh wow there's a ton of them 16:35:01 http://dpaste.com/0ES2ZCE 16:38:04 advil: you might be able to see them with `find . -name "._*" -type f -print` in a terminal 16:38:19 and apparently `dot_clean` can get rid of them, though this is just me parroting info from stackoverflow 16:39:58 nope 16:40:20 I suspect that because I have a HFS+ partition they are getting cleaned up when unarchiving 16:42:39 now we know how to sneak crawl content past advil 16:52:43 anyhow, issue is on github. thanks! 18:24:16 Unstable branch on underhound.eu updated to: 0.26-a0-284-g73c0fb6129 (34) 18:29:46 03ebering02 07[charming-items] * 0.26-a0-284-g43d9e47: Charm dispersal 🔕: Remove the Charms school, skill, and Skalds 10(5 hours ago, 97 files, 83+ 373-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/43d9e474628d 18:29:46 03ebering02 07[charming-items] * 0.26-a0-285-g351b0cb: fixup! Charm dispersal 🔕: Move Death's Door to Necromancy only 10(5 hours ago, 1 file, 1+ 1-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/351b0cb61c44 18:29:46 03ebering02 07[charming-items] * 0.26-a0-286-g974656d: fixup! Charm dispersal 🔕: Remove the Charms school, skill, and Skalds 10(86 minutes ago, 1 file, 1+ 1-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/974656d1322f 18:29:46 03ebering02 07[charming-items] * 0.26-a0-287-gff1c9b9: Charming item 🔔: Scarf of Shadows 10(60 minutes ago, 9 files, 29+ 4-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/ff1c9b97a804 18:29:46 03ebering02 07[charming-items] * 0.26-a0-288-gcf487c6: fixup! Charm dispersal 🔕: Spell removals 10(11 minutes ago, 1 file, 0+ 7-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/cf487c6be29f 18:29:46 03ebering02 07[charming-items] * 0.26-a0-289-g25fec73: fixup! Remove Sticks to Snakes 10(9 minutes ago, 4 files, 0+ 20-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/25fec73af188 18:29:46 03ebering02 07[charming-items] * 0.26-a0-290-g0da3ad5: fixup! fixup! Charm dispersal 🔕: Spell removals 10(6 minutes ago, 7 files, 0+ 41-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/0da3ad5b6b7c 18:29:46 03ebering02 07[charming-items] * 0.26-a0-291-g3572a9d: Charming item 🔔: Amulet of Flames 10(4 minutes ago, 13 files, 29+ 20-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/3572a9d56e16 18:37:27 the amulet probably needs either evo scaling or to be an unnrand 18:38:29 nice, a melee oriented armour ego 18:41:54 i think it feels more unrand-ish to me, yeah 18:42:09 just in terms of the flashiness of the effect 18:45:46 04Build failed for 08charming-items @ 3572a9d5 06https://github.com/crawl/crawl/actions/runs/166773780 18:49:17 also should the scarf of shadows be evil? that doesn't seem right 18:51:01 (or if it is, then the robe of night probably should be too i guess) 19:30:58 Blyxx (L27 FoFi) ERROR: range check error (20 / 20) (Hell) 19:46:14 !crashlog 19:46:16 22323. Blyxx, XL27 FoFi, T:63941 (milestone): https://crawl.kelbi.org/crawl/morgue/Blyxx/crash-Blyxx-20200712-233038.txt 19:49:46 It should maybe be evil but implementing conducts for pure passives is a bit wonky so I currently went the same route and made it non evil like robe of nigh 20:07:08 ah, i think there's maybe just a leftover line of code then, i asked because of: https://github.com/crawl/crawl/blob/ff1c9b97a80467ae41a3522c177968129ad016f0/crawl-ref/source/player-equip.cc#L894 20:10:11 oh, good catch! 20:10:19 I'd toyed with making it evil but didn't back thaat out 22:16:40 DoorBlock (L18 FoCK) Crash caused by signal #6: Aborted (D (Sprint)) 22:52:33 !crashlog sprint 22:52:35 1. sprint, XL21 CeHu, T:51753 (milestone): http://crawl.akrasiac.org/rawdata/sprint/crash-sprint-20190203-215150.txt 22:52:40 !crashlog DoorBlock sprint 22:52:40 2. DoorBlock, XL18 FoCK, T:11232 (milestone): https://crawl.kelbi.org/crawl/morgue/DoorBlock/crash-DoorBlock-20200713-021609.txt 23:26:46 03kate-02 07* 0.26-a0-285-gaeb6479: Remove unused trap code 10(24 hours ago, 4 files, 5+ 10-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/aeb647976c22 23:26:46 03kate-02 07* 0.26-a0-286-g2f081d9: Remove the Aura of Abjuration and Recall spells 10(9 days ago, 14 files, 13+ 133-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/2f081d995b6f 23:26:46 03kate-02 07* 0.26-a0-287-g2ad3f57: Prevent training summoning under Sacrifice Love 10(9 days ago, 1 file, 1+ 1-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/2ad3f57c505c 23:26:46 03kate-02 07* 0.26-a0-288-g602cf09: Don't offer sacrifice summoning after sacrificing love 10(9 days ago, 1 file, 11+ 4-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/602cf09890b6 23:26:46 03kate-02 07* 0.26-a0-289-ga89f556: Adjust Summon Greater Demon hostility 10(33 hours ago, 2 files, 12+ 8-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/a89f556fec44 23:26:46 03kate-02 07* 0.26-a0-290-g1fcefbe: Remove Summon Butterflies 10(27 hours ago, 20 files, 27+ 118-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/1fcefbe3cb73 23:26:46 03kate-02 07* 0.26-a0-291-g3d11bbf: Remove the book of Beasts 10(26 hours ago, 9 files, 11+ 15-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/3d11bbfad57e 23:32:05 rip that abyss exit vault 23:32:41 it looks like quite something yeah, i don't think i've ever come across it ingame 23:32:53 I haven't 23:33:06 also, you killed my secret tech 23:33:11 !lg . -log 23:33:11 328. ebering, XL27 MuNe, T:103583: https://crawl.kelbi.org/crawl/morgue/ebering/morgue-ebering-20200710-232319.txt 23:33:32 I used recall with Gozag bribed dudes in tomb to move my bribed army after teleporting 23:33:47 mmm, powerful 23:34:56 the sgd change, i wonder if it should apply to makhleb too. But I do like the hostile on summon chance 23:36:06 i think having them be distinct in that way is good maybe, where with makhleb if it starts friendly it'll always stay that way at least 23:37:13 i could also see removing the spells and just having them be a makhleb thing, there's no shortage of other really good summon spells around those levels 23:37:30 think gammafunk is leaning along those lines 23:37:41 there are an awful lot of good summon spells at that level 23:38:12 imo both summon demon and sgd could go and the school would be fine 23:38:12 especially in summon demon's case where it doesn't even really have the power level to make it interesting 23:38:12 i know there was someone who disliked monstrous menagerie more but i forget who 23:38:12 we do not want for cool summons 23:38:16 menag and shadow creatures have issues 23:38:39 I dunno Summons is down the queue of my crawl magic tinkerings 23:39:06 so I haven't given them as much thought 23:41:49 yeah, definitely room for a bigger rethink there but removing summon demon and sgd sounds like a fine thing to do in the meantime, maybe i'll poke at that after finishing up this cblink stuff 23:44:57 re cblink stuff: I know I said it in the pr comments but I want to reiterate my desire to keep PoG in the Wr book at least for now 23:45:05 I dunno if that's included in what you're doing 23:46:48 yeah, i saw that and added it back, it sounds fine to keep there to me 23:47:49 i'm mostly just messing with options for what to do with PoG in zot, and then got sidetracked by discovering that golubria traps timeout based on actions taken rather than on time 23:48:11 ah 23:48:13 Unstable branch on crawl.kelbi.org updated to: 0.26-a0-291-g3d11bbfad5 (34) 23:48:15 ooof 23:52:17 idea for pog flavour: the orb of zot prevents use of pog whenever they are on the same floor. So you can use pog until zot:5 and then never after picking it up. Or the portals stay open but act as uncontrolled blink 23:55:06 03ebering02 07[charming-items] * 0.26-a0-292-gbf95645: fixup! Charming item 🔔: Scarf of Shadows 10(4 hours ago, 1 file, 0+ 1-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/bf9564560edb 23:55:06 03ebering02 07[charming-items] * 0.26-a0-293-g7c882b1: squash! Charming item 🔔: Amulet of Flames 10(2 minutes ago, 3 files, 6+ 4-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/7c882b150cd8