00:06:57 Monster database of stone_soup-0.21 branch on crawl.develz.org updated to: 0.21.3-3-g218456f21e 00:40:38 -!- misha is now known as werekitten 01:08:06 Stable branch on crawl.develz.org updated to: 0.24.1-8-ga250c9d538 (34) 01:21:18 Experimental (bcrawl) branch on underhound.eu updated to: 0.23-a0-3015-g7f46a08de7 01:22:42 -!- Amnesiac_ is now known as Amnesiac 01:22:46 Monster database of stone_soup-0.20 branch on crawl.develz.org updated to: 0.20.2-3-g29329e0561 01:39:03 Monster database of stone_soup-0.19 branch on crawl.develz.org updated to: 0.19.6-3-g7d5932f76a 02:19:36 Stable (0.18) branch on underhound.eu updated to: 0.18.2-3-g5ac21b8443 03:22:02 Stable (0.21) branch on crawl.beRotato.org updated to: 0.21.3-3-g218456f 03:27:03 Hi there :) I saw that 0.24.1 was tagged on March 22 (together with a bunch of patch releases, I assume all to fix CVE-2020-11722), but there's no matching tarball in https://crawl.develz.org/release/?C=N;O=D 03:27:28 I'm updating my Mageia Linux package to fix the regression, and already backported the relevant commits but I figured that having the pristine 0.24.1 would be better 03:28:59 I can make my own stone_soup-0.24.1-nodeps.tar.xz using your makefile, so I just wanted to confirm if the absence of released binaries/tarball is a matter of time and not that 0.24.1 is otherwise not ready for production 03:35:29 Akien: yes, we tagged 0.24.1 but never made an official bugfix release; that tag was certainly ok at the time it was made, but there's been another vulnerability patched very recently, so we'd need to make a 0.24.2 03:35:34 %git stone_soup-0.24 03:35:34 07advil02 * 0.24.1-8-ga250c9d: Pointer checks for lua userdata objects 10(2 days ago, 9 files, 125+ 58-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/a250c9d538d3 03:36:40 I'm not sure of what the requirements are of your package, but we'll be making a 0.24.2 at some point with at least that commit, possibly with some other bug fixes from trunk cherry-picked as well 03:45:22 gammafunk: Thanks, I saw this on GitHub and wondered indeed if that would be worth cherry-picking. I guess for now I can package 0.24.1 + that commit, and then package 0.24.2 when it's out. 03:45:36 Unless 0.24.2 is planned fairly soon, in which case I could just wait for it. 03:46:43 Akien: yeah, we might be making 0.24.2 fairly soon, but I can't give you a date; it might make more sense for us to wait until after tournament in a month or so, and do 0.24.2 along with a future 0.25.1 03:47:16 since 0.24.1 had a lot of bug fixes cherry-picked, there wouldn't be too much we'd cherry-pick to 0.24.2 aside from that security fix, I think 03:49:02 Akien: oh, actually, it's the last three commits from the head of that branch that fix the security issue 03:49:19 it might make the most sense to just take all 8 commits after 0.24.1 03:50:18 there are some reasonbly important bugfixes in 0.24 branch after 0.24.1 as I look at it now; 8 commits in total, and the recent 3 are releated to the security issue 03:52:19 so I guess I'd recommend to get everything in stone_soup-0.24 right now, if possible; definitely grab at least the latest three commits if you want to be more minimalistic and only get 0.24.1 + the recent security fixes 03:53:58 Fork (bcadrencrawl) on crawl.kelbi.org updated to: 0.22.1-2628-g3c2b7ef425 03:58:33 gammafunk: Thanks, I'll package the stone_soup-0.24 branch directly then. 04:30:52 alexjurkiewicz, with a rolling system, you'd still use the exact same save compact logic as now 04:32:01 the only difference is that we'd incrementally remove ifdef compact code at about the same rate as we add it 04:34:12 there's zero additional burden to the adding a new minor, removing items, etc 06:38:46 nice 08:22:26 Stable (0.19) branch on underhound.eu updated to: 0.19.6-3-g7d5932f76a 09:23:54 Stable (0.22) branch on underhound.eu updated to: 0.22.3-3-g34f245f157 12:21:07 Stable (0.21) branch on underhound.eu updated to: 0.21.3-3-g218456f21e 12:31:01 Ashenzari Exploration Trap Effect Prevention - Not In God Description 13https://crawl.develz.org/mantis/view.php?id=12245 by gressup 13:14:20 Stable (0.21) branch on crawl.akrasiac.org updated to: 0.21.3-3-g218456f 14:21:08 advil: for the diagnosing-old-saves use-case, are you mainly dealing with saves that won't open at all? 14:21:40 for old saves that do load, one possibility is to display directly in the error message the version at which support was dropped 15:41:18 !kw warriormage 15:41:21 Keyword: warriormage => --Sk|--Tm|--Wr|--AM|--En|--Re|--St|--Cr 15:41:25 !kw adventurer 15:41:25 Keyword: adventurer => Ar|Wn 15:41:42 !kw warriormage --Sk|--Tm|--Wr|--AM|--En 15:42:12 Defined keyword: warriormage => --Sk|--Tm|--Wr|--AM|--En 15:55:01 !kw byrolegroup 15:55:02 Keyword: byrolegroup => s=regexp_replace(regexp_replace(regexp_replace(regexp_replace(regexp_replace(cls, "^(As|Fi|Gl|Hu|Mo|Th).*", "Warrior"), "^(Art|Wan).*", "Adventurer"), "^(Ab|Be|Ch|De|He|Je|Pa|Pr).*", "Zealot"), "^(Arc|Cr|En|Re|Sk|St|Tr|Warp).*", "WarriorMage"), "^(Ai|Co|Ea|Fi|Ic|Ne|Re|Su|Ve|Wi).*", "Mage") 16:19:51 aidanh it would usually come up when something doesn't upgrade right or crashes on upgrade 17:16:40 we should set a feature freeze soon before I run rampant on more magic projects 17:16:58 gammafunk: I know you'd tentatively floated some dates for release/t 17:31:10 ebering: yeah, looks like may will actually be OK for me and would prefer that we get tournament finished well before end of june 17:31:15 so we could try for mid may? 17:31:25 I know advil needs to do some cleanup for CAO 17:31:34 and ideally we'd hear back from snark about sequell issues 17:31:57 possibly I could do the CAO cleanup if I can know what I'd need to clean up 17:32:06 then there are any changes to the tournament 17:32:14 a project we continually put on the back burner 17:32:39 tbf redesigning tournament rules and then implementing them are non-trivial things to do 18:15:29 03ebering02 07* 0.25-a0-861-g340c9e8: Adjust monster behavior for working with ranged allies 10(39 minutes ago, 1 file, 26+ 29-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/340c9e81949e 18:15:49 that might be a bit controversial 18:15:49 but subtle 18:15:49 er, ffaaster than Chei 18:15:50 a mid-may feature freeze sounds good for me 18:23:10 ebering: btw, leda's having no drawback is a step backwards in the fight against straightforward buff spells that you turn on before every fight of consequence 18:23:54 it's just an extremely strong spell now with no real thought required about when to use it 18:24:11 I think it should get the slow movement back 18:26:49 (I forget the precise numbers at this point (I looked them up a week or two ago but then forgot to bring it up here) but the effect of leda's is something like "you take 25% less damage in melee from most monsters and can outrun melee monsters as though you had haste") 18:29:17 and really it's stronger than that since you get some value out of monsters around you taking longer to reposition themselves to surround you, get clear lines of fire, etc 18:30:19 it's not necessarily too strong, but it's too strong for something that you can just turn on and have the effects of it for 20ish turns without thinking about it again 18:58:29 Unstable branch on crawl.kelbi.org updated to: 0.25-a0-861-g340c9e8194 (34) 19:18:05 -!- werekitten is now known as misha 19:20:23 elliptic: yeah, I was concerned about that. adding the movement penalty back without the attack fumbling is probably a happy middle ground 22:55:34 So after all these years isn't it time to finally start making a version 2 with animated monsters, objects and environments, smooth interpolated movement, sound, like Pixel Dungeon? 22:55:51 Nobody tries to do anything challenging with the Crawl codebase 22:55:54 It's just status quo 23:02:37 You can if you like, I guess 23:16:01 feel free 23:16:13 it's open source 23:16:22 I have all that implemented in a local branch 23:16:25 ...offline 23:54:15 it's pushed to another repo, you wouldn't know it 23:54:57 I wonder how hard it would be to substitute in animated gif monster sprites 23:55:12 maybe the first step would be removing the sprite sheet logic for webtiles 23:56:08 i suppose most webtiles servers don't support http2 tho