00:13:11 03Emily02 07https://github.com/crawl/crawl/pull/1359 * 0.25-a0-788-g1cbc9c1: Remove the Deflect Missiles spell 10(6 days ago, 35 files, 25+ 179-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/1cbc9c11d2fb 00:13:11 03Emily02 07https://github.com/crawl/crawl/pull/1359 * 0.25-a0-789-g84c5d73: Give monsters that had Deflect Missiles +2 EV 10(6 days ago, 1 file, 4+ 4-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/84c5d73a6e3e 00:13:11 03Emily02 07https://github.com/crawl/crawl/pull/1359 * 0.25-a0-790-gcee6ea42: Remove logic for multi-level missile deflection 10(6 days ago, 9 files, 21+ 57-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/cee6ea42a9aa 00:13:11 03Emily02 07https://github.com/crawl/crawl/pull/1359 * 0.25-a0-791-g7d99b6a: Rename deflection to repulsion in code and dumps 10(6 days ago, 11 files, 28+ 28-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/7d99b6a8b8bc 00:13:11 03Emily02 07https://github.com/crawl/crawl/pull/1359 * 0.25-a0-792-g79cb2e4: Rename the book of Enchantments to Hexes 10(6 days ago, 12 files, 25+ 25-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/79cb2e4c58b1 00:54:33 gammafunk: clone the svenstaro/upload-release-action action? You could I gues, but it probably isn't necessary (unless upstream refuses the PR) 01:00:07 alexjurkiewicz: well, one of the reasons for that could be to avoid things that would just break arbitrarily due to some change upstream 01:00:17 it might make more sense to just move the relevant files into crawl/crawl 01:00:54 You specify a tag / ref as well as the repo, and actions generally use versioned tags, so I wouldn't be too worried about that 01:01:06 eg svenstaro/upload-release-action@v1 01:01:33 It might be easier just to remove the version from the file name. It's probably not a big deal 01:02:03 03Alex Jurkiewicz02 07https://github.com/crawl/crawl/pull/1361 * 0.25-a0-788-gd16ea96: Simplify CI version detection 10(5 minutes ago, 1 file, 8+ 48-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/d16ea96bfa93 01:02:14 yeah, it might be fine to just reference the action if we can version it that way 01:46:44 03ebering02 07* 0.25-a0-788-g88dfbed: Tone down hell effect miscasts 10(40 minutes ago, 1 file, 2+ 2-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/88dfbedd8440 01:46:44 03ebering02 07* 0.25-a0-789-g6fc3743: Tone down miscast effects and retool severity colors 10(31 minutes ago, 4 files, 22+ 14-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/6fc3743e770f 01:46:44 03ebering02 07* 0.25-a0-790-g7dfdf1c: Add miscast effects to spell descriptions 10(4 minutes ago, 3 files, 91+ 22-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/7dfdf1ca8f51 01:50:17 03Emily02 {ebering} 07* 0.25-a0-791-g53a3069: Remove obsolete temporary RMsl status logic 10(7 days ago, 1 file, 1+ 5-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/53a3069714de 01:50:17 03Emily02 {ebering} 07* 0.25-a0-792-gc449921: Remove the Deflect Missiles spell 10(7 days ago, 35 files, 25+ 179-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/c44992132757 01:50:17 03Emily02 {ebering} 07* 0.25-a0-793-g2ea948a: Give monsters that had Deflect Missiles +2 EV 10(6 days ago, 1 file, 4+ 4-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/2ea948a12f18 01:50:17 03Emily02 {ebering} 07* 0.25-a0-794-g5ff3ae7: Remove logic for multi-level missile deflection 10(7 days ago, 9 files, 21+ 57-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/5ff3ae7eddca 01:50:17 03Emily02 {ebering} 07* 0.25-a0-795-g8b45d1b: Rename deflection to repulsion in code and dumps 10(7 days ago, 11 files, 28+ 28-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/8b45d1b2b909 01:50:17 03Emily02 {ebering} 07* 0.25-a0-796-gd415a3f: Rename the book of Enchantments to Hexes 10(7 days ago, 12 files, 25+ 25-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/d415a3ffb045 02:09:31 Windows builds of master branch on crawl.develz.org updated to: 0.25-a0-790-g7dfdf1ca8f 02:26:23 Unstable branch on crawl.kelbi.org updated to: 0.25-a0-796-gd415a3ffb0 (34) 02:45:03 Monster database of master branch on crawl.develz.org updated to: 0.25-a0-651-g8c222c7a2b 03:08:51 03gammafunk02 07* 0.25-a0-797-g0023389: A new curse skull tile (kormed) 10(39 minutes ago, 1 file, 0+ 0-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/0023389d7747 03:24:03 Unstable branch on crawl.beRotato.org updated to: 0.25-a0-797-g0023389 (34) 03:32:40 Unstable branch on crawl.kelbi.org updated to: 0.25-a0-797-g0023389d77 (34) 03:38:26 -!- Euph0ria is now known as EuphOria 03:38:32 -!- EuphOria is now known as Euph0ria 05:03:05 New branch created: pull/1365 (1 commit) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/pull/1365 05:03:05 03Goratrix02 07https://github.com/crawl/crawl/pull/1365 * 0.25-a0-798-gc4e2489: WIndows installer package build cleanup 10(5 minutes ago, 2 files, 2+ 1-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/c4e24896401a 05:13:56 03Alex Jurkiewicz02 07https://github.com/crawl/crawl/pull/1361 * 0.25-a0-788-g57e46f7: Simplify CI version detection 10(4 hours ago, 1 file, 12+ 48-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/57e46f7ef7bc 05:24:48 03Goratrix02 07https://github.com/crawl/crawl/pull/1361 * 0.25-a0-798-gc4e2489: WIndows installer package build cleanup 10(27 minutes ago, 2 files, 2+ 1-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/c4e24896401a 05:24:48 03Alex Jurkiewicz02 07https://github.com/crawl/crawl/pull/1361 * 0.25-a0-789-gf7718ea: Remove unnecessary continuation 10(6 minutes ago, 1 file, 1+ 1-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/f7718ea332df 05:24:48 03Alex Jurkiewicz02 07https://github.com/crawl/crawl/pull/1361 * 0.25-a0-803-g0e0187f: Merge branch 'pr-1365' into trunk-build-artifacts 10(6 minutes ago, 0 files, 0+ 0-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/0e0187f6038a 10:13:48 alexjurkiewicz something is odd with your PR, after the force push there's a conflict error but only on "rebase and merge" (the other two merge modes are green) and I don't see from any of the files changed why there should be a conflict at all 10:14:45 I suppose I could fetch it and check myself 10:19:48 haha I remember making this https://gist.github.com/rawlins/487afd18fddea1b244ef80401f4f70e6 10:31:15 advil, that's because the "Rebase and merge" mode fakes more history than the other two modes do 10:31:32 I think there's something weird about the branch right now 10:32:15 in repositories I manage, I generally disable the "Rebase and merge" option, and only allow squash and create merge commit 10:32:26 I get the same issue locally when I try to rebase, even though it's already on top of trunk, it seems to be a merge conflict (internal to the branch) when the patches are run in sequence 10:32:49 *on top of trunk HEAD 10:35:27 it's likely there's a conflict-causing change in one of the commits, which is later reverted 12:50:04 03theJollySin02 {ebering} 07* 0.25-a0-798-g4798a01: Add room for tactics in small arrival vaults 10(7 weeks ago, 1 file, 83+ 130-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/4798a01ea9c5 12:50:04 03Byrel Mitchell02 {ebering} 07* 0.25-a0-799-g3ae2296: Add room for tactics to arrival vaults in small.des 10(4 weeks ago, 2 files, 144+ 168-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/3ae22969f6f8 12:50:44 ebering: oh, I should have told you I had changes to that in a local branch 12:50:58 but that's fine, I can just do follow up commits (re: 798) 12:52:17 you mean 4798? 12:52:41 0.25-a0-798-g4798a01 12:52:44 that PR 12:52:48 yah 12:52:54 it's fine, I did a ton of work on it and hadn't gotten to finishing it 12:52:59 so I'll just make a fullow up 12:53:06 *follow up 12:53:23 I presume you're doing more extensive edits, both of those were very surgical "bare minimum to meet the goal" type changes 12:53:23 I was thinking it might be good to systematically remove no_monster_gen from arrival vaults now 12:53:39 yeah, that PR was made before your monster gen fix 12:53:44 yeah, mine are a bit more extensive, although not anything too drastic 12:54:01 the other thing is trap gen 12:54:23 this one is a bit tricky, I almost feel it would be vastly simpler to do no_trap_gen on all arrival vaults 12:54:50 03Goratrix02 {ebering} 07* 0.25-a0-800-gc6e39c4: Adjust Vehumet gift range 10(2 weeks ago, 1 file, 2+ 2-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/c6e39c492d30 12:55:09 otherwise we're left with trying to patch up each one if we want to make some assurances about traps in e.g. corridors 12:55:28 yeah, I think no_trap_gen on all arrival vaultss is reasonable 12:55:53 they should get exploration traps from those vaults normally, right? I forget if we have a special condition for d:1 12:56:25 after turn 0 12:56:29 cool 12:56:30 so you get to see your initial LOS 12:56:40 turn 0 shaft does sound epic 12:56:51 it was possibile in the initial implementation 12:57:00 aas was instant double shafting 12:57:05 nice 12:57:10 start turn 0 on D:3 glhf 12:57:25 almost as good as that game minmay mentions all the time, where an AK generated in lava, and died before the screen finished rendering 13:01:30 !newmiscastdeath name=Niven -tv 13:01:31 3. Niven, XL5 GrEE, T:2958 requested for FooTV: telnet://termcast.develz.org or http://termcast.develz.org. 13:01:45 casting a spell warned as "potentially lethal" 13:05:26 03Nikolai Lavsky02 {ebering} 07* 0.25-a0-801-gab8e1e7: Tweak lava pools in nicolae_crawler_farm 10(31 hours ago, 1 file, 8+ 10-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/ab8e1e778f97 13:06:18 Unstable branch on crawl.kelbi.org updated to: 0.25-a0-800-gc6e39c492d (34) 13:17:35 Unstable branch on crawl.kelbi.org updated to: 0.25-a0-801-gab8e1e778f (34) 13:21:04 it seems possible to cause arrival to entail no_trap_gen when parsing a vault 13:31:33 Unstable branch on crawl.akrasiac.org updated to: 0.25-a0-800-gc6e39c4 (34) 13:56:29 advil: meaning you wouldn't have make that tag on each vault? 13:56:39 yeah 13:57:07 hrm, it's sort of an interesting documentation question 13:57:14 we've solved that problem in the past with a common setup function 13:57:20 e.g. ghost vaults, and just lots of other sets of vaults 13:57:29 that would also be an option 13:57:30 which is nice in that vault makers can see what's being done 13:57:50 yeah, maybe we should do that, then 13:58:14 otherwise vault makers won't know about that functionality hidden in the code; of course we can also put comments in the relevant files 13:58:29 the downside of the setup function approach is that it's possible to forget to add it to a map 13:58:33 well, I'm assuming `arrival` is already documented somewhere, we would add to that 13:58:50 good question, actually; not sure if it is 13:59:10 https://github.com/crawl/crawl/blob/master/crawl-ref/docs/develop/levels/syntax.txt#L344 14:00:12 yeah, I guess the more practical location for that is dat/des/arrival/arrival_guide.txt 14:00:27 good that we also have in syntax guide 14:00:35 I'm not sure if there are any other cases where a tag is silently added though, so it might be unexpected behavior from that perspective 14:00:47 (I have a vague memory of something where this might happen, but can't pin it down) 14:00:54 right, I guess I learn towards use of a setup function 14:00:58 which can also set arrival tag 14:27:09 New branch created: pull/1366 (6 commits) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/pull/1366 14:27:10 03Emily02 07https://github.com/crawl/crawl/pull/1366 * 0.25-a0-798-g343ba09: Remove redundant -Tele logic from tiles 10(2 hours ago, 1 file, 1+ 3-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/343ba09dcd82 14:27:10 03Emily02 07https://github.com/crawl/crawl/pull/1366 * 0.25-a0-799-g02312e5: Remove unused monster Controlled Blink code 10(2 hours ago, 1 file, 1+ 3-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/02312e5397c0 14:27:10 03Emily02 07https://github.com/crawl/crawl/pull/1366 * 0.25-a0-800-gf2075c2: Remove the Controlled Blink spell 10(2 hours ago, 10 files, 9+ 20-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/f2075c271285 14:27:10 03Emily02 07https://github.com/crawl/crawl/pull/1366 * 0.25-a0-801-gf9eb60f: Remove Passage of Golubria from the Warper book 10(2 hours ago, 1 file, 0+ 1-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/f9eb60fba1fc 14:27:10 03Emily02 07https://github.com/crawl/crawl/pull/1366 * 0.25-a0-802-gaf26e66: Refactor controlled blinking code 10(75 minutes ago, 3 files, 14+ 54-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/af26e6621b01 14:27:10 03Emily02 07https://github.com/crawl/crawl/pull/1366 * 0.25-a0-803-g6c105a5: Don't contaminate the player on controlled blink 10(32 minutes ago, 1 file, 0+ 2-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/6c105a50b9a5 14:27:42 aggressive 14:31:41 I like the way emily thinks 14:42:13 I'm not sure I agree with removing PoG from the Wr start 14:44:27 what monsters did ever have controlled blink? 14:44:58 oh, I guess if a monster had it it would just blink randomly 14:45:02 so probably a ghost thing 14:45:19 i don't think anything could ever get it, ghosts had it fixed up to regular blink 14:58:45 ebering: I guess it could be nice to rework Wr spells a bit; teleport other sort of stands out as a not terribly fun spell 14:59:15 but translocations spell designs are a bit tricky 14:59:58 we tried making translocations/conjurations a thing, to not very good success! 14:59:58 bring back singularity 2020 15:00:07 if only irc hade emote reactions, I'd react to that with an angry kraken head 15:03:59 I still do think there are probably things in the neighborhood of that spell that could work 15:05:24 I wonder if moving some of how it worked to gell's would be good 15:05:45 a spell with a similar idea that is not well-loved despite it getting a number of reworks over the years 15:06:49 hmm, is it intended that tukima's dance works under sac love? i guess maybe disarming a monster and running away makes it technically not useless but it feels like it should just be uncastable 15:07:13 probably should not castable, yeah 15:07:55 I guess it depends on how emergent you want effects from a sacrifice to be, but it seems we've veered much more towards "it should just be strictly a penalty in all ways" 15:08:26 gammafunk: I like teleport other! 15:08:30 I guess making a hostile dancing weapon is a fairly bad penalty and worse than just not animating the weapon in the first place 15:08:45 yet you removed teleportation from distortion! 15:08:56 pretty similar idea really 15:09:50 I'm not gunning for removal of that spell, I guess, but it's possible to make the Wr spells better if we did lose PoG from the book 15:10:11 I guess it's also fine if PoG is in the book, don't have strong feelings about that either 15:10:50 well with distortion you don't have as much a choice 15:10:50 with teleport other you pick your target! 15:10:53 and can opt to not teleport something 15:10:53 gammafunk yeah I think salvaging gell's that way could be an interesting thing to try 15:11:03 I mean, you sort of expect that telport or banish is likely to happen though 15:11:37 advil: it's possible too that a somewhat higher spell level could work too, if you made it effectively stronger 15:11:44 ??book of spatial translocations 15:11:44 book of spatial translocations[1/1]: Blink, Shroud of Golubria, Lesser Beckoning, Gell's Gravitas, Teleport Other, Passage of Golubria 15:12:52 wow, 6 spells 15:13:00 forgot that it had lesser beckoning 15:13:03 or did we remove shroud 15:13:28 nope! 15:13:35 not yet... 15:13:35 !lg . wr 15:13:36 20. gammafunk the Commander (L27 GnWr of Okawaru), escaped with the Orb and 3 runes on 2018-08-18 02:10:47, with 1382754 points after 107539 turns and 11:34:38. 15:13:39 hehe 15:13:53 it's been almost two years since I've played warper, that's why 15:16:05 New branch created: pull/1367 (5 commits) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/pull/1367 15:16:05 03Emily02 07https://github.com/crawl/crawl/pull/1367 * 0.25-a0-798-ga6860e0: Use pkg-config for SQLite 10(49 minutes ago, 1 file, 10+ 29-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/a6860e03010b 15:16:05 03Emily02 07https://github.com/crawl/crawl/pull/1367 * 0.25-a0-799-gde0c030: Drop support for ANCIENT_SQLITE 10(49 minutes ago, 1 file, 0+ 5-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/de0c030d666b 15:16:05 03Emily02 07https://github.com/crawl/crawl/pull/1367 * 0.25-a0-800-gbdd7713: Don't assume Darwin/macOS lack pkg-config 10(46 minutes ago, 1 file, 0+ 3-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/bdd771335c7e 15:16:05 03Emily02 07https://github.com/crawl/crawl/pull/1367 * 0.25-a0-801-g2e12e70: Fix SDL2 #include paths 10(38 minutes ago, 4 files, 5+ 5-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/2e12e70c1ce2 15:16:05 03Emily02 07https://github.com/crawl/crawl/pull/1367 * 0.25-a0-802-g5354538: Use fc-match(1) in util/find_font 10(30 minutes ago, 2 files, 7+ 15-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/53545380446f 15:18:18 I was thinking of turning shroud into an item and removing it from wr with no recourse (and giving skald the item to start) but that's still a sketchy plan and kate-- has some concerns with the current draft 15:19:19 my opinion remains the same as last time someone tried this, pkg-config should not be enabled by default on mac 15:23:23 03kate-02 07* 0.25-a0-802-g0be837a: Don't allow casting Tukima's Dance under Sac Love 10(32 seconds ago, 1 file, 1+ 0-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/0be837aa7798 15:32:58 Unstable branch on crawl.kelbi.org updated to: 0.25-a0-802-g0be837aa77 (34) 15:36:38 I generally do think emily might benefit from discussing ideas in this channel 15:36:48 e.g. the pkg-config thing has come up before and there are reasons why it is that way 15:37:09 similar with save compat 15:39:08 I mean, I'm not going to close that issue because I also think we should increment the major tag, but I'm also not interested in working on doing it, and for that project it needs someone to volunteer quite a lot of time and energy I think 15:40:00 understandable; I guess we don't frown on people communicating mostly through the github interface, which is pretty nice these days, but it can be a bit hard to do that effectively with a forum-type interface exclusively 15:40:00 for larger projects, I mean 15:40:16 inb4 someone suggest we move everything to Discord 15:40:32 yeah, I guess once upon a time there were regular contributors who didn't interact at all in irc? It's just not the model I'm familiar with 15:41:09 there sort of was, but to be honest I don't really recall much during my time other than dpeg trying to encourge people to do long form discussion on the mailing list 15:41:16 and these days we'd pretty clearly use github for that 15:42:23 can't really think of anyone who authored a lot of stuff but didn't like to talk via IRC, except one case where someone got banned for hostility and got patches in by talking to wheals 15:42:59 the infamous chriso 15:43:10 I got the impression that there were some with commit access back in the days of the big forest blowup 15:43:45 well, the people involved with that were 1kb, dracoomega, and regret-index 15:43:50 all of which were irc regulars at that time 15:44:29 in terms of the blow-up part, grunt and I and lots of others were also around and stayed around after those three left 15:44:39 don't actually recall anyone involved in that who didn't use IRC 15:44:49 dpeg was also an irc regular at the time 15:46:14 before my time it's possible there were more non-irc people who regularly made large contributions, of course 15:53:28 well, I obviously wasn't around but from reading through the emails one of the sources of tension was fragmentation across multiple communication channels, where some people thought the expectation of having to keep up with irc wasn't reasonable 15:54:45 so maybe the complaint was really that one subset of people only discussed stuff on irc 15:54:52 (I guess that view won long-term) 15:59:34 advil: yeah, the clash a bit more specifically between 1kb and DO and r-i, who had been collaborating on how to split out the forest work; they probably had been discussing a bunch of it themselves outside of irc, and I'm not sure if they had any complaints about irc in particular 15:59:42 but DO and r-i were both quite active in IRC 16:00:31 that split was a bit more about those personalities but also about 1kb probably being tired of putting in so much work for so long and wanting a break from all of that and all of the debate about game changes such work entailed 16:01:05 DO left more due to all the hostility he got from that episode as well as from certain portions of the community in particular 16:02:13 Another dev, SamB, who was somewhat active mostly in infrastructure stuff, sort of set some unkind stuff to DO in channel that I thought was very unecessary 16:02:28 hello memory lane 16:02:43 but it was a bit chaotic and I think multiple people were just feeling a bit burnt out at the same time 16:02:58 yeah bh probably remembers some of that! 16:03:13 s/sort of set/sort of said/ 16:03:30 it was a shit show. 16:04:47 at one point dpeg came in and said something along the lines of "Look, after thinking about it and talking over with 1kb, I think we should just revert the Forest dispersal changes" 16:04:59 and then we just didn't do that an no one really said anything! 16:06:05 I do think that conflict was more about people getting tired of crawl dev as a whole for multiple reasons 16:07:07 right, my knowledge of it is mostly from reading primary sources long after the fact so I doubt it resembles what it was like to be there 16:07:07 obviously communication channels can be part of that, and encouraging people to use them can help avoid "dev fatigue" 16:07:30 but the communication channel stuff was in the main drama thread here: https://sourceforge.net/p/crawl-ref/mailman/message/31896473/ especially galehar's responses 16:07:53 anyways, I didn't mean to rake all this up :-) 16:13:11 yeah, no I did read through those replies at the time, but had forgotten a lot of details, including how galehar had weighed in 16:13:14 a trip down memory lane 16:54:31 woah what a trip 16:54:46 there have been a couple contributors that I've interacted with mostly through gh but its been for small scale things 16:54:59 everyone writing patches at emily scale that I've merged has made an apperance here 17:08:53 IRC WILL NEVER DIE!!! 17:30:04 03ebering02 07* 0.25-a0-803-g58bd184: Prevent allies from blinking near traps (Pekkekke) 10(2 minutes ago, 1 file, 16+ 0-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/58bd18402a0d 17:32:50 Unstable branch on crawl.kelbi.org updated to: 0.25-a0-803-g58bd18402a (34) 18:18:26 advil: not sure what's going on there, i've rebased to master manualy and pushed 18:19:06 03Alex Jurkiewicz02 07https://github.com/crawl/crawl/pull/1361 * 0.25-a0-804-g6bb920e: Upload release builds to GitHub releases 10(5 days ago, 6 files, 156+ 37-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/6bb920e681ea 18:19:06 03Alex Jurkiewicz02 07https://github.com/crawl/crawl/pull/1361 * 0.25-a0-805-gc5839c0: Update release process 10(22 hours ago, 1 file, 17+ 46-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/c5839c00472c 18:19:06 03Alex Jurkiewicz02 07https://github.com/crawl/crawl/pull/1361 * 0.25-a0-806-g191986a: Simplify CI version detection 10(17 hours ago, 1 file, 12+ 48-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/191986a53f22 18:19:06 03Alex Jurkiewicz02 07https://github.com/crawl/crawl/pull/1361 * 0.25-a0-807-gdb158ae: Remove unnecessary continuation 10(13 hours ago, 1 file, 1+ 1-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/db158aeb70e4 18:19:06 03Goratrix02 {Alex Jurkiewicz} 07https://github.com/crawl/crawl/pull/1361 * 0.25-a0-808-gce76692: WIndows installer package build cleanup 10(13 hours ago, 2 files, 2+ 1-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/ce76692ee8fe 18:19:29 it looks like that probably fixed it 18:20:34 ah. it was because inside the branch, I had merged in goratrix's PR 18:20:44 rebase removed the merge commit which had some manual conflict resolution 18:23:10 Unstable branch on underhound.eu updated to: 0.25-a0-803-g58bd18402a (34) 19:09:13 about requiring IRC... it's really hard to keep up with this channel. I'm not sure how I still do. If communication happened primarily on a forum-type system like github, discourse or (god forbid) a mailing list, it would be easier for me to keep up, at least 19:43:34 was the old dev 'galehar' french? 19:49:35 yes 20:20:03 03riverfiend02 {gammafunk} 07* 0.25-a0-804-g50c693f: New Hep+Dith shared overflow altar 10(6 days ago, 1 file, 27+ 0-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/50c693f41855 20:32:33 Unstable branch on crawl.kelbi.org updated to: 0.25-a0-804-g50c693f418 (34)