01:21:21 Experimental (bcrawl) branch on underhound.eu updated to: 0.23-a0-2313-g5eb34e082d 01:34:14 -!- amalloy is now known as amalloy_ 03:23:37 Unstable branch on crawl.beRotato.org updated to: 0.24-a0-574-g7d3d5a4 (34) 03:30:49 Fork (bcrawl) on crawl.kelbi.org updated to: 0.23-a0-2313-g5eb34e082d 05:38:14 Timed portals appearing on dungeon overview screen 13https://crawl.develz.org/mantis/view.php?id=12048 by kitchen_ace 09:24:12 Stable (0.22) branch on underhound.eu updated to: 0.22.1-59-ge965b3aba3 09:59:58 Fly status confusingly described 13https://crawl.develz.org/mantis/view.php?id=12049 by damerell 10:48:10 New branch created: pull/1137 (1 commit) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/pull/1137 10:48:10 03dplusplus02 07https://github.com/crawl/crawl/pull/1137 * 0.24-a0-550-gd864e6b: fix mutations/vamp-attrs toggle 10(16 hours ago, 2 files, 7+ 5-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/d864e6bfad32 11:21:40 Stable (0.23) branch on underhound.eu updated to: 0.23.1-89-g277498a001 11:42:28 03advil02 07* 0.24-a0-575-gd66451a: Handle portals differently in dungeon overview (12048) 10(7 minutes ago, 3 files, 22+ 7-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/d66451a9e92f 11:48:03 Unstable branch on crawl.kelbi.org updated to: 0.24-a0-575-gd66451a9e9 (34) 13:27:36 Unstable branch on crawl.akrasiac.org updated to: 0.24-a0-575-gd66451a (34) 13:35:50 reskin (L6 TrMo) ASSERT(peek_uint64() == initial_peek) in 'random.h' at line 64 failed. (D:4) 13:37:30 !crashlog 13:37:49 21015. reskin, XL6 TrMo, T:2684 (milestone): https://crawl.kelbi.org/crawl/morgue/reskin/crash-reskin-20190820-173539.txt 13:38:06 reskin (L7 TrMo) ASSERT(peek_uint64() == initial_peek) in 'random.h' at line 64 failed. (D:5) 13:42:31 03advil02 07* 0.24-a0-576-g91963d7: Remove a debugging check that is tripping for dith chars 10(66 seconds ago, 1 file, 0+ 2-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/91963d7417d8 13:47:29 Unstable branch on crawl.kelbi.org updated to: 0.24-a0-576-g91963d7417 (34) 13:57:20 man it's mostly happened in a branch so I haven't complained about it here, but the fact that monster::holiness checks attack flavour has been one of my banes for this project 13:57:40 because checking attack flavour is incredibly complicated and holiness is checked *constantly* 14:15:21 zbzbzb (L8 OpFi) ASSERT(brentry[whither.branch] == level_id()) in 'files.cc' at line 1416 failed. (D:8) 14:15:45 zbzbzb (L8 OpFi) ASSERT(brentry[whither.branch] == level_id()) in 'files.cc' at line 1416 failed. (D:8) 14:17:13 zbzbzb (L9 OpFi) ASSERT(brentry[whither.branch] == level_id()) in 'files.cc' at line 1416 failed. (D:8) 14:18:02 zbzbzb (L9 OpFi) ASSERT(brentry[whither.branch] == level_id()) in 'files.cc' at line 1416 failed. (D:8) 14:18:30 !crashlog 14:18:32 21022. zbzbzb, XL9 OpFi, T:6524 (milestone): http://crawl.berotato.org/crawl/morgue/zbzbzb/crash-zbzbzb-20190820-181753.txt 14:19:45 zbzbzb (L9 OpFi) ASSERT(brentry[whither.branch] == level_id()) in 'files.cc' at line 1416 failed. (D:8) 14:47:28 03advil02 07* 0.24-a0-577-gdfe7613: Put seed in crashlogs 10(70 seconds ago, 1 file, 6+ 0-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/dfe76135efb4 14:47:44 not sure how people will feel about this commit 14:49:02 would like to keep it for a little while, while I'm debugging stuff like the ^ crash though 14:53:03 that crash makes it look like two ossuaries generated, which should be impossible 14:53:06 right? 14:54:03 zbzbzb (L9 OpFi) ASSERT(brentry[whither.branch] == level_id()) in 'files.cc' at line 1416 failed. (D:8) 14:59:41 oh 14:59:45 the first one was a mimic 14:59:50 heh 15:02:27 Unstable branch on crawl.kelbi.org updated to: 0.24-a0-577-gdfe76135ef (34) 15:03:01 advil: for trunk I'm not so worried about "seed cheats"; While they are CAO scored we get crash reports here, and if someone is forcing an intentional crash to get their seed we'd notice p quick 15:04:03 fair 15:07:55 03advil02 07* 0.24-a0-578-gf1077d3: Don't update brentry for portal mimics 10(83 seconds ago, 1 file, 6+ 2-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/f1077d32986c 15:08:36 -!- zoid is now known as deceit 15:09:08 -!- deceit is now known as zoid 15:17:26 Unstable branch on crawl.kelbi.org updated to: 0.24-a0-578-gf1077d3298 (34) 15:21:30 Unstable branch on crawl.beRotato.org updated to: 0.24-a0-578-gf1077d3 (34) 15:23:56 03advil02 07* 0.24-a0-579-g962dd19: Fix a gcc warning 10(47 seconds ago, 1 file, 1+ 1-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/962dd19927ed 15:27:12 03advil02 07* 0.24-a0-580-g6a6c3f8: Fix another misc compiler warning 10(21 seconds ago, 2 files, 0+ 3-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/6a6c3f83c195 15:32:50 Unstable branch on crawl.kelbi.org updated to: 0.24-a0-580-g6a6c3f83c1 (34) 16:06:58 The build was broken. (master - f1077d3 #11840 : advil): https://travis-ci.org/crawl/crawl/builds/574511047 16:33:03 I guess I don't get credit for the fix if I push it before the travis bot complains 16:40:14 !lm zbzbzb 16:40:25 9219. [2019-08-20 18:53:54] zbzbzb the Cleaver (L9 OpFi) ASSERT(brentry[whither.branch] == level id()) in 'files.cc' at line 1416 failed on turn 7437. (D:8) 18:22:38 Unstable branch on underhound.eu updated to: 0.24-a0-580-g6a6c3f83c1 (34) 19:36:03 MackTheFife (L11 FeEn) ASSERT(peek_uint64() == initial_peek) in 'random.h' at line 64 failed. (D:10) 19:37:55 MackTheFife (L11 FeEn) ASSERT(peek_uint64() == initial_peek) in 'random.h' at line 64 failed. (D:10) 19:39:33 MackTheFife (L11 FeEn) ASSERT(peek_uint64() == initial_peek) in 'random.h' at line 64 failed. (D:10) 19:40:28 MackTheFife (L11 FeEn) ASSERT(peek_uint64() == initial_peek) in 'random.h' at line 64 failed. (D:10) 19:43:17 MackTheFife (L11 FeEn) ASSERT(peek_uint64() == initial_peek) in 'random.h' at line 64 failed. (D:10) 19:58:55 !crashlog 19:58:57 21029. MackTheFife, XL11 FeEn, T:16341 (milestone): http://crawl.akrasiac.org/rawdata/MackTheFife/crash-MackTheFife-20190820-234315.txt 20:03:37 Unstable branch on crawl.akrasiac.org updated to: 0.24-a0-580-g6a6c3f8 (34) 21:07:49 -!- amalloy_ is now known as amalloy 22:40:47 -!- amalloy is now known as amalloy_ 22:49:01 hrm, is the only way to handle TAG_MAJOR for a bitfield to had == 34 with the current order and add > 34 with the new order? 22:49:37 I have removed values so it seems like I need a > 34 block with the redefined values 22:50:43 I suppose there's not actual requirement to redefined the values to not have gaps 22:51:01 s/not actual/no actual/ 23:20:49 packed_cell shouldn't need TAG_MAJOR stuff since it's not marshalled, right?