00:26:49 Unstable branch on CRAWL.XTAHUA.COM updated to: 0.23-a0-446-g036aa52 (34) 00:36:12 the basic difference seems to be that can_hibernate checks more things (gear, recently slept), and can_sleep doesn't. the code you linked is used to help monsters decide whether to hex you; as is, they waste their time trying to hibernate you because they don't "know" it's impossible 00:39:18 mons_has_incapacitating_spell is apparently not used anywhere, according to github search, so it doesn't really matter what its intent is. if you looked through history you might find out what it was used for 01:28:02 Unstable branch on crawl.develz.org updated to: 0.23-a0-446-g036aa52 (34) 01:58:36 Windows builds of master branch on crawl.develz.org updated to: 0.23-a0-446-g036aa52 02:59:47 Monster database of master branch on crawl.develz.org updated to: 0.23-a0-446-g036aa52 06:20:29 -!- amalloy is now known as amalloy_ 06:56:34 good morning folks, so quick question, to enable ssl all I really have to do is get the certs, enable the ssl options in config.py correct? 06:58:14 for webtiles on DGL I mean 06:59:07 enable / configure 09:01:55 is there an apache config that redirects to tornado on any of the official branches? if so can I see the relevant apache config? having the damndest time getting my morgue's working 09:04:31 nevermind actually looking through that section again 12:01:47 Autoexplore fails (near translucent wall) 13https://crawl.develz.org/mantis/view.php?id=11764 by nubinia 12:23:43 Unstable branch on crawl.akrasiac.org updated to: 0.23-a0-446-g036aa52 (34) 12:24:04 Am I legally allowed to have an ad on a hosted server if it doesn't impact gameplay at all? (just sits there out of the way) 12:53:36 From what I'm gathering from the liscense I believe it is completely legal, however I want to double check before I launch 13:03:32 It's GPLv2, so why not? (I'm no authority, but I doubt the aggregate scoring, say, would want to count a spammy server) 13:06:55 it's not even a case of spammy, it's one static link along the bottom written in text, no image, in theme with the game 13:07:09 well the style is in theme with the game, 13:08:00 tbh, cjr strikes me as rather more "spammy" than that sounds 13:08:24 I'm not trying to grab attention with it, but it supports my company which is also hosting it, so it's there as a nod rather than a real means of generating revenue 13:09:23 <|amethyst> I mean, we'd probably *prefer* if you didn't have ads for illegal or morally questionable things, but even then you wouldn't be violating the license 13:09:43 What server do you run? 13:10:27 its not one of the big ones, and I'm not sure if I'm allowed to drop the url so I want to check on that as well before I do for you cerpin 13:11:06 Ok, don't worry about it then 13:11:32 okay sounds good 13:11:37 thanks folks 13:11:48 Just wanted to make certain nothing I used was about to end up with an ad 13:12:31 ahh no, the only people who might see it here might catch it coming through facebook or instagram in a minute, I've never posted the address here :) 14:35:31 robe of Vines has outdated text 13https://crawl.develz.org/mantis/view.php?id=11765 by Angani 15:38:27 -!- bairyn is now known as ByronJohnson 15:39:47 -!- amalloy_ is now known as amalloy 16:27:29 03amalloy02 {GitHub} 07* 0.23-a0-447-g7b583b2: Update robe of vines text (Angani, #11765) 10(10 seconds ago, 1 file, 1+ 1-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/7b583b2f2cc4 16:46:37 Huene`: you can certainly post the url here 17:10:51 Unstable branch on crawl.jorgrun.rocks updated to: 0.23-a0-447-g7b583b2f2c (34) 18:22:48 Unstable branch on underhound.eu updated to: 0.23-a0-447-g7b583b2f2c (34) 22:01:54 MarvinPA_: Are you aware of any reason why bushes need to have the "two of them block los" thing? 22:07:05 I personally like this. Why should there be a reason? It's a very cool quirk. 22:11:34 for consistency with trees back when trees had that 22:12:07 btw, why did trees lose that? 22:19:26 "in general having areas full of trees where you 22:19:26 can see lots of enemies but not target them just plays badly." 22:19:52 Ok, I can see why it was bad with trees. Same argument doesn't stand for bushes. 22:28:49 it's very difficult to reason about what LoS is visible with the "two block los" algorithm 22:37:42 Yermak: We work off the principle that there should always be a reason for any aspect of gameplay, not merely that it's different for the sake of being different 22:38:36 in this case I can't see how there's anything gained by having things behind two layers of bushes not be visible 23:40:15 gammafunk, I'd call this bush thing a flavour. It doesn't hurt anything, and when a new player discovers this fact, he thinks something along the lines: "Oh, cool, two bushes block your line of sight! Makes sense, I guess." This little features make Crawl enjoyable. 23:41:07 s/This/These 23:42:24 Disagree that it doesn't hurt anything; makes bushes harder to use (design-wise) for their intented purpose of letting monsters shoot the player through them! 23:42:55 it's also not really uses in a meaningful way, and I'm generally against just adding obscure mechanics for flavor reasons 23:43:13 s/uses/used/ 23:44:13 heh, do you plan to make a new vault, where oklob plant is hidden behind several layers of bushes? 23:44:53 actually I found out about this when I was trying to make a bush border behind a water border on two sides 23:45:01 and yes, it preventing me from doing so on both sides 23:45:19 imagine a worm guantlet vault where the worms on either side can't even pull you back and forth! 23:45:25 I don't want to live in that world 23:45:39 and neither does minmay 23:45:56 03gammafunk02 07* 0.23-a0-448-g1c01f63: Fix exclusions for stationary monsters behind solid features (paterick) 10(32 minutes ago, 3 files, 21+ 1-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/1c01f6317855 23:46:09 ahah 23:46:12 I give up, I guess this reason is good enough. 23:49:49 Btw, thorn hunter already has completely transparent plants that can be shoot through. Or is it only hunter itself who can shoot through them? 23:50:31 Yeah I believe that is the case 23:50:39 probably the exception is just for the one spell they have too 23:50:47 @?thorn hunter 23:50:47 thorn hunter (00f) | Spd: 12 (swim: 120%) | HD: 15 | HP: 83-115 | AC/EV: 9/9 | Dam: 27, 23 | 03plant, amphibious, see invisible, unbreathing | Res: 06magic(100), 03poison, 12drown, 13neg+++, 13torm | Vul: 04fire | XP: 2121 | Sp: v.thorns (3d18) [11!AM, 06!sil], w.brambles [06!sil] | Sz: Large | Int: animal. 23:50:53 volley of thorns