00:00:07 <Eksell> Unstable branch on CRAWL.XTAHUA.COM updated to: 0.23-a0-301-g9da9e51 (34)
02:48:36 <Gretell> Monster database of master branch on crawl.develz.org updated to: 0.23-a0-301-g9da9e51
03:11:57 <Rotatell> Unstable branch on crawl.beRotato.org updated to: 0.23-a0-301-g9da9e51 (34)
06:02:20 -!- amalloy is now known as amalloy_
10:23:10 <Cheibriados> 03ebering02 07* 0.23-a0-302-g45ed416: Reactivate autopickup when using stairs (mdonais) 10(13 minutes ago, 1 file, 1+ 0-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/45ed4168a98d
10:40:57 <ebering> `..
11:10:54 <Jorgrell> Unstable branch on crawl.jorgrun.rocks updated to: 0.23-a0-302-g45ed4168a9 (34)
11:37:03 <Cheibriados> 03ebering02 07* 0.23-a0-303-gfcac5de: Allow confusing touch with a weapon 10(8 minutes ago, 4 files, 13+ 10-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/fcac5dec1221
11:37:57 <travis-ci> The build was broken. (master - 45ed416 #10381 : Edgar A. Bering IV): https://travis-ci.org/crawl/crawl/builds/438276218
12:04:40 <ebering> re unrand reform: IMO Misfortune should be removed since it's just an id game trap for unrand robes
12:07:43 <gammafunk> well it may be that removal is the best option, but keep in mind that unrand robes are already an id game trap for unrand robes
12:08:02 <gammafunk> er s/unrand/randart/
12:08:15 <gammafunk> doesn't it look like a randart robe initially?
12:09:39 <gammafunk> it's playing off of what already happens for randart robes
12:09:47 <ebering> ya
12:10:01 <gammafunk> and yeah I'm not sure it's really worth playing off of
12:10:07 <ebering> yeah, I think it isn't
12:10:45 <Jorgrell> Unstable branch on crawl.jorgrun.rocks updated to: 0.23-a0-303-gfcac5dec12 (34)
12:11:11 <gammafunk> you could get ambitious and go for a robe that had a lot of good props but a bunch of * ones
12:11:36 <gammafunk> *Noise *Contam *Drain *Slow *Corr and then some amazing stuff
12:12:08 <gammafunk> guess it's sounding like a fixedart but it could be something that's actually worth using
12:12:27 <gammafunk> I think the theme is great, maybe the realization of the theme is just bad
12:12:43 <gammafunk> that's all the deep thoughts I really have about it without putting much more effort in
12:13:10 <gammafunk> the idea of a lot of * props does sound kind of cute at least
12:13:17 <gammafunk> oh and you can't do *Noise on armour, can you
12:13:42 <gammafunk> I guess you could give it unrand noise or other unrand bad props; it could be a design that's fun to play with I suppose
12:17:06 <ebering> maybe. preltty easy to just end up bad though
12:17:10 <ebering> give it Harm :P
12:18:03 <gammafunk> ooh, that could work too
12:39:02 <ebering> hellmonk's hex enhancer suggestion was very thematic
12:39:21 <ebering> Hex, Harm, *Contam, *Drain, *Slow, *Corr
12:39:24 <ebering> so flavorful
12:41:49 <gammafunk> it's better to just give it archmagi
12:42:20 <gammafunk> hexes don't especially want for spellpower and its really narrowing down the set of chars to use it
12:43:14 <gammafunk> well realistically even enchanters probably wouldn't like it all that much but it depends on what else it might have
12:44:04 <gammafunk> you can go for other kinds of bonuses, a robe with big EV like minmay mentioned
12:44:57 <gammafunk> we have robe of folly already
12:45:00 <gammafunk> ??robe of folly
12:45:00 <Sequell> robe of folly[1/1]: A +3 robe of the Archmagi {MR-- Int+5 Curse}. Was -100 MR instead of -80 in 0.13 and older.
12:45:09 <gammafunk> so probably enhancing spellpower is just not the way to go with this
12:46:14 <gammafunk> Harm on a robe is sort of already covering spell ehancement as it is and is a distinct property for a robe to have
12:46:35 <gammafunk> so I think it's maybe a case of finding some non-damage properties to possibly balance harm and the others
12:47:44 <ebering> yeah
13:06:00 <Henzell> Unstable branch on crawl.akrasiac.org updated to: 0.23-a0-303-gfcac5de (34)
15:02:59 -!- amalloy_ is now known as amalloy
18:21:33 <Lantell> Unstable branch on underhound.eu updated to: 0.23-a0-303-gfcac5dec12 (34)
20:38:06 -!- amalloy is now known as amalloy_