00:00:36 <Eksell> Unstable branch on CRAWL.XTAHUA.COM updated to: 0.22-a0-479-gc6e99f3 (34)
00:58:22 <Rotatell> Unstable branch on crawl.beRotato.org updated to: 0.21-a0-643-g786e97d (34)
01:29:12 <aidanh> johnstein: you're probably aware of this, but it looks like /static/style.css got reverted to a previous version
01:34:26 <johnstein> I don't even know what that file is. did that reversion just happen after 786e97d installed?
01:34:29 <johnstein> %git e03441e
01:34:29 <Cheibriados> 07gammafunk02 * 0.20-a0-1132-ge03441e: Two overflow transporter vaults 10(1 year, 1 month ago, 1 file, 95+ 0-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/e03441e5eb43
01:40:33 <johnstein> %git 0.20-a0
01:40:33 <Cheibriados> 07Brannock02 * 0.20-a0: Finalize 0.19 changelog 10(1 year, 8 months ago, 1 file, 1+ 1-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/8ddec9435a29
01:40:36 <aidanh> could be that, or could be 786e97d: they both have the same file
01:40:51 <johnstein> is this a file I need to manaully install?
01:41:08 <johnstein> I'm not at all familiar with the static files for the webserver
01:42:10 <aidanh> you shouldn't need to manually install it; it was installed and working just fine before
01:42:37 <johnstein> yea, it's another fallout of me trying to do the version transfer stuff... :/
01:42:39 <johnstein> ugh
01:43:05 <aidanh> my guess is that the update Rotatell just announced overwrote it
01:43:29 <johnstein> yea sounds like it. I modified the install script to stop setting the date of old versions to NOW
01:43:36 <aidanh> yeah, no worries, take your time fixing it; just letting you know
01:43:52 <johnstein> since that screwed things up before (I actually missed that this time too, but I think for sure I got it now)
01:44:02 <johnstein> but I didn't do any modification of the static stuff
01:46:54 <johnstein> %git
01:46:54 <Cheibriados> 07gammafunk02 {GitHub} * 0.22-a0-479-gc6e99f3: Merge pull request #788 from NormalPerson7/fix-temple-vault 10(8 hours ago, 0 files, 0+ 0-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/c6e99f3da94b
01:46:58 <johnstein> &versions
01:47:20 <Sequell> CAO: 0.22-a0-474-g19b682e, CBRO: 0.22-a0-479-gc6e99f3, CDO: 0.22-a0-469-gf26638a, CJR: 0.22-a0-479-gc6e99f3da9, CPO: 0.22-a0-479-gc6e99f3, CUE: 0.22-a0-475-g101988f953, CWZ: 0.22-a0-422-g9628fc8, CXC: 0.22-a0-479-gc6e99f3, LLD: 0.22-a0-443-g17c3723931
01:50:07 <johnstein> should get fixed next time trunk is built
01:50:17 <johnstein> I can't rebuild it now since it's already up to date
01:50:32 <johnstein> it's not just that file, basically all the files in there....
01:51:02 <johnstein> this is really annoying trying to install these old versions and not screwing something else up...
01:51:31 <aidanh> thanks
01:52:06 <johnstein> np. your stuff has been easy :)
01:52:06 <aidanh> I wouldn't worry about the other files much; everything in static/ hasn't been modified in a few years, with the exception of chat.js courtesy of advil
01:52:29 <aidanh> great :) glad to hear
01:52:44 <johnstein> oh. did I just blow away the mute fix?
01:54:24 <aidanh> yeah it got blasted back to the past as well
01:55:14 <johnstein> bleh
01:55:35 <johnstein> I hate to ask for this, but could you or another dev just push some new commit. maybe fix a typo or something
01:55:43 <johnstein> then I can rebuild and get everything back
01:55:55 <aidanh> but since client.js got blasted at the same time, I believe it will just work
01:55:59 <johnstein> and tomorrow I can try again to do my fancy updates after thinking about things more
01:56:11 <johnstein> ^status
01:56:11 <Rotatell> 21 Crawlers. CBRO disk usage=99% (135GB) | RAM usage=28% (4GB)| uptime/CPU= 01:56:10 up 158 days,  5:32,  5 users,  load average: 0.91, 0.83, 0.98 (4 Cores) http://status.berotato.org
01:56:14 <johnstein> bah
01:56:22 <aidanh> yeah, sure, I noticed a FOUC with the ui-overhaul stuff that I can fix and push now
01:56:33 <johnstein> gotta be a master commit though
01:59:48 <Cheibriados> 03Aidan Holm02 07* 0.22-a0-480-g991dd4b: Fix webtiles lobby flash-of-unstyled-content 10(78 seconds ago, 1 file, 1+ 1-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/991dd4b2b45e
02:03:00 <aidanh> johnstein: there ya go
02:06:38 <johnstein> thanks!
02:06:54 <johnstein> my dumb workaround 'install-oldtrunks' script really doesn't work well
02:07:17 <johnstein> in addition to it installing old crap in the webserver, it also seems to screw up the submodules
02:07:31 <johnstein> SDL2 in this case. had to go in and do some manual fixin'
02:09:15 <aidanh> shouldn't need to do anything with sdl2 for a webtiles build (you'd think)
02:09:23 <johnstein> !tell gammafunk I'm trying to install the right 0.20-a0 version for my transfers. I found this one: %git 0.20-b1~1 -> 0.20-a0-1132-ge03441e but when I try to compile, it gets to macro.cc and I ^status
02:09:24 <Sequell> johnstein: OK, I'll let gammafunk know.
02:09:26 <johnstein> oops
02:09:29 <johnstein> ^status
02:09:30 <Rotatell> 17 Crawlers. CBRO disk usage=97% (135GB) | RAM usage=12% (4GB)| uptime/CPU= 02:09:29 up 158 days,  5:45,  4 users,  load average: 1.56, 1.37, 1.22 (4 Cores) http://status.berotato.org
02:09:54 <Jorgrell> Unstable branch on crawl.jorgrun.rocks updated to: 0.22-a0-480-g991dd4b2b4 (34)
02:10:29 <johnstein> !tell gammafunk it gets to macro.cc and I get a compile error that I forgot to copy. trying to figure out if A) that's the right version I should use for 0.20-a0, and B) how the heck to even get it to compile.
02:10:29 <Sequell> johnstein: OK, I'll let gammafunk know.
02:18:30 <Rotatell> Unstable branch on crawl.beRotato.org updated to: 0.22-a0-480-g991dd4b (34)
02:20:28 <aidanh> wrt 'install-oldtrunks', probably just building the crawl binary is enough
02:21:06 <aidanh> ... unless it dies when it can't find maps etc I guess
02:36:44 <johnstein> it needs to be a legit install so players can choose to not transfer to newer versions
02:36:44 <johnstein> but this makes me wonder now
02:37:15 <johnstein> if I'm playing an old trunk version from like 0.18 or something, if there's a single webserver installed, shouldn't this issue happen a lot?
02:37:38 <johnstein> i.e. old trunk versions being out of sync with the latest trunk version's webserver installs?
02:37:54 <johnstein> as usual, I don't have a full understanding of what's really going on
02:39:02 <johnstein> ok new plan
02:39:08 <aidanh> there are two scripts: update-trunk and update-stable; my guess is that the latter does not clobber the stuff in static/
02:41:14 <johnstein> update-stable only runs for experimentals and the stable releases. we run update-trunk every night, so I think the files in webserver/static get updated every single night (potentially)
02:42:02 <aidanh> and aren't you doing an automatic forced update? in this case at least you wouldn't need to ask players whether to update
02:42:27 <johnstein> also, my new plan is to not install the latest a0 for each version, I'm just going to point them all to MY latest version. so for 0.20, instead of 0.20-a0-1132-ge03441e, which I don't have and I can't even install (because it won't compile and because it breaks things), I can just use the existing: 0.20-a0-1126-g0f15420 which is close enough
02:42:52 <johnstein> heh. I'm confusing things by simultaneously discussing two things.
02:43:15 <aidanh> right, so as long as you only install newer revisions with update-trunk, and your trunk install is always the newest, you shouldn't have problems
02:43:27 <johnstein> general comments/questions on how we currently handle the normal updating of trunk every night and how we don't force old trunk games to update
02:44:21 <johnstein> since we don't force old games to update, but we only have a single static folder for the webserver (which as far as I can see should/could affect both trunk and stable), how do old trunk games that haven't been transferred deal with being 'out of sync' with the static files?
02:44:40 <johnstein> or is our saving grace that we usually don't change those files much, so it's not usually a big deal in practice?
02:44:50 <aidanh> oh, that's simple; we never break compatibility in that directory
02:45:17 <johnstein> oh ok. so it's a conscious decision to ensure the current static files play nice with old versions
02:45:31 <johnstein> that sounds fun when you are trying to add cool new stuff
02:45:52 <aidanh> yeah, 'fun' is one word for it...
02:45:54 <aidanh> heh
02:46:33 <johnstein> I'm using the Dwarf Fortress definition of FUN
02:47:14 <aidanh> pretty much
02:47:53 <aidanh> you also don't have access to the game version/hash from JS in that folder, so you can't do the same sort of compatibility stuff you can do in C
05:35:39 -!- Euph0ria is now known as TabMasher
05:38:06 -!- TabMasher is now known as Euph0ria
05:38:20 -!- Euph0ria is now known as EuphOria
09:59:30 <advil> johnstein: hm, do you mean to say that there is *just one* copy of static for every version?
09:59:50 <advil> I had sort of naively guessed something like one per each
10:00:18 <advil> though I guess since the lobby is part of static, it needs to be outside versioning to some degree
10:01:56 <aidanh> there's one copy of game_data/ per version, which I contains a static/, and then theres a top level static/ for the lobby
10:03:45 <advil> which one is it using when it is in a game?
10:04:21 <advil> i.e. does it actually use the per version static files?
10:09:20 <aidanh> games use game_data for most stuff, but the top level static/ provides an api for showing/hiding dialogs, used by inventory etc
10:30:04 <advil> oh, I misunderstood
10:30:16 <advil> webserver/static/ is specifically what I was trying to ask about
10:31:12 <advil> so that's what I was wondering if there's just a single copy of
10:34:25 <advil> and it seems the answer is yes
10:37:07 <aidanh> I wonder if it might be worth splitting that into a separate repo
10:39:05 <aidanh> or at least removing the code sharing between lobby and game
10:39:47 <aidanh> the added code duplication may or may not be better than the perpetual backcompat requirement
10:41:53 <gammafunk> I made a commit in webtiles-changes
10:41:56 <gammafunk> let me find it
10:43:08 <gammafunk> %gti 912e21c75b080
10:43:13 <gammafunk> %git 912e21c75b080
10:43:13 <Cheibriados> 07gammafunk02 * 0.16-a0-3794-g912e21c: Add Makefile targets to build only the WebTiles client files 10(3 years, 5 months ago, 1 file, 18+ 8-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/912e21c75b08
10:43:24 <gammafunk> splits building the client into its own make target
10:43:30 <ebering> is there
10:47:50 <ebering> is there an autumn tile for mons plant?
10:49:30 <gammafunk> don't think so
10:55:12 <johnstein> advil: yea there’s only one webserver/static folder. not sure if any of the stuff in there ever gets copied to any of the version folders
10:55:34 <johnstein> also gammafunk you might be able to ignore my !tell from last night
10:55:57 <johnstein> I think I’m going to give up on installing old versions that match up to the latest ao
10:56:23 <johnstein> it’s too fraught with unintended perils
10:57:00 <johnstein> so I’m going to just update all games to whatever the highest version I actually have. which isn’t perfect but good enough. esp since so many of these games are quite likely abandoned anyway
11:02:47 <gammafunk> johnstein: gotcha, I hadn't really looked into it further, but that seems pretty reasonable
11:06:59 <aidanh> webtiles chat FR: add a little green dot to the favicon when there are unread messages in a background webtiles tab
11:11:28 <gammafunk> webtiles chat FR: allow the chat window to pop out to a resizable window
11:12:51 <gammafunk> oh this was a sort of fun thing I added to webtiles changes, it's probably a bad idea, but it was on cpo for a while
11:14:09 <gammafunk> %git 2df5926d53
11:14:09 <Cheibriados> 07gammafunk02 {edlothiol} * 0.15-a0-2344-g2df5926: Player title colors and descriptions for WebTiles lobby and chat 10(3 years, 8 months ago, 10 files, 302+ 9-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/2df5926d53a2
11:15:27 <gammafunk> def get_nerdtype(self, username):
11:17:46 <aidanh> that's very nifty; does it work for non-react webtiles?
11:18:21 <gammafunk> no, since the trunk webtiles doesn't have that USR2 signal handler support
11:18:40 <gammafunk> of course course it wouldn't be hard to merge; but I think you'd also want to think a bit harder about the general approach
11:18:56 <gammafunk> one problem is that it's all done through sequell nicks that anyone can update
11:19:21 <gammafunk> and I guess the other is that it's not really controlling for someone registering an account on a server where the relevant user hasn't already
11:19:29 <gammafunk> and this could be seen as encouraging that
11:23:00 <gammafunk> maybe if the query could be done through the script instead of using a nick it could be more secure, and for devs we could indicate which servers the account is on
11:23:16 <gammafunk> there's a little txt file where we save the dev player accounts
11:28:20 <aidanh> it's the sort of thing I'd be tempted to punt on until SSO is finally implemented
11:38:28 -!- amalloy is now known as amalloy_
11:44:56 <gammafunk> yeah
11:48:43 -!- amalloy_ is now known as amalloy
12:03:42 <ebering> gammafunk: https://pastebin.com/8LGddKDQ could I get your feedback on this vault?
12:04:45 -!- amalloy is now known as amalloy_
12:25:53 <DarkwingDuck> aidanh, you told me to report bugs with the ui overhaul server?
12:26:29 <DarkwingDuck> if you set a skill to stop leveling at a certain point, and you reach that point with no other skills active, you normally get a prompt telling you to pick a skill to level.
12:27:19 <DarkwingDuck> when this happened to me (training axes), the menu to select a skill did not pop up.  i hard-froze for a few seconds, then the game crashed.  Error message, "Unfortunately, your game crashed" (1,25) into (80,24)
12:27:55 <DarkwingDuck> this was on webtiles, bero where you were watching me earlier.  im going on lunch now but will return in a lil bit.
12:28:09 <aidanh> DarkwingDuck: thanks for letting me know
12:28:32 <aidanh> I've reproduced the other issues you mentioned, with the exception of being unable to scroll on menus
12:31:18 <aidanh> DarkwingDuck: and if I don't respond to any later messages, it's likely because I've gone to bed, but I will eventually see them
12:59:07 <DarkwingDuck> oh. to clarify - i can scroll on menus. pgup and pgdown work just fine. the menu issue was that the -more- at the bottom was still present even though there was no more content to scroll thru.
13:05:09 <Henzell> Unstable branch on crawl.akrasiac.org updated to: 0.22-a0-480-g991dd4b (34)
13:05:44 <ebering> gammafunk: one more https://pastebin.com/hbeEquSb
13:15:09 -!- yesno_ is now known as yesno
14:23:01 <gammafunk> ebering: thanks, will take a look and get back to you
14:53:43 <gammafunk> ebering: btw if you want to go ahead and put those in a PR, you can, and I can review from there
14:54:03 <gammafunk> if you feel they're too alpha for that though, I can just give you some feedback when I get to that
14:55:40 <floraline> is the "Setting Up dgamelaunch and WebTiles" wiki page considered the most up-to-date reference?
14:56:21 <floraline> for setting up a public facing server
14:56:33 <gammafunk> heh, it is, yes, but you may run into issues not covered there
14:57:38 <floraline> yeah i figured its not perfect but i just wanted to make sure there wasn't some better document
14:58:00 <floraline> thanks
15:45:48 -!- amalloy_ is now known as amalloy
15:51:01 <amalloy> i wonder if darkwingduck's menu crash was http://crawl.berotato.org/crawl/morgue/DarkwingDuck/crash-DarkwingDuck-20180608-015817.txt - that's the only crashlog i see from that player, but it doesn't look related to UI code
15:56:09 <gammafunk> amalloy: can you verify that the crash is the right file?
15:56:09 <gammafunk> !crash DarkwingDuck
15:56:09 <Sequell> 1. DarkwingDuck, XL9 DENe, T:12424 (milestone): http://crawl.berotato.org/crawl/morgue/DarkwingDuck/crash-DarkwingDuck-20180608-015817.txt
15:56:13 <gammafunk> !lm DarkwingDuck crash
15:56:14 <Sequell> 1. [2018-06-08 01:58:17] DarkwingDuck the Scholar of Death (L9 DENe of Kikubaaqudgha) Crash caused by signal #13: Broken pipe (D:7)
15:56:19 <gammafunk> !lm DarkwingDuck crash x=file
15:56:20 <Sequell> 1. [2018-06-08 01:58:17] [file=cbro/crawl/meta/git/milestones] DarkwingDuck the Scholar of Death (L9 DENe of Kikubaaqudgha) Crash caused by signal #13: Broken pipe (D:7)
15:56:24 <gammafunk> so that's trunk
15:56:27 <gammafunk> not the UI branch
15:56:34 <gammafunk> you can probably do
15:56:45 <gammafunk> !kw experimental
15:56:45 <Sequell> Keyword: experimental => explbr!=||file~~(smithgod|jump|combo_god)
15:56:58 <gammafunk> !crash DarkwingDuck experimental
15:56:59 <Sequell> No milestones for DarkwingDuck (experimental crash).
15:57:09 <gammafunk> actually I think that experimental simply hasn't been added to sequell
15:57:11 <gammafunk> which we could do
15:57:19 <gammafunk> assuming it has a milestone file set up etc
15:57:20 <amalloy> right, i wasn't sure whether something different needs to be done to see crashes in an explbr
15:58:00 <gammafunk> it needs an entry in sequell's config I think
15:58:12 <gammafunk> johnstein: hrm, are you aware that http://crawl.berotato.org/crawl/dev/ is public?
15:58:15 <gammafunk> I'm not sure what that is
15:59:40 <gammafunk> looks like it might be webtiles-changes
15:59:51 <gammafunk> maybe thats dbro
16:10:31 <johnstein> that is dbro
16:11:04 <johnstein> but I see a few things I want to modify
16:12:22 <johnstein> I haven’t created the PR for sequell to add the stuff for ui-overhaul
16:12:34 <johnstein> I’ll do that maybe today
16:12:39 <gammafunk> johnstein: I can add it to sequell, but I don't see the dir in meta
16:12:42 <gammafunk> on cbro
16:12:51 <johnstein> I haven’t made the links either
16:13:12 <gammafunk> gotcha, well you can make the full PR if you'd like, or just make the links work and let me know, either way
16:13:17 <gammafunk> I can merge PR or make entries
16:16:04 <johnstein> ok. I’ll let you know. thanks
16:52:03 <ebering> gammafunk: I'll just put them in a pr and force-push I guess but these feel pretty alpha, I still don't have a good sense of valut smithing
16:52:38 <gammafunk> yeah, that's fine, and no worries, it just takes a bit of practice and learning all the syntax
16:52:51 <gammafunk> I can review from the PR a bit more easilly
16:54:44 <muffindrake> Does there strictly need to be elaborate loot distribution code or can vaults simply rely on *|$ to place items accordingly?
16:54:51 <muffindrake> Say, if a vault only appears in Depths
16:55:34 <gammafunk> muffindrake: certainly if it's only one branch
16:55:38 <ebering> gammafunk: ok, pr sentoff
16:55:49 <gammafunk> and it's not too bad if it only appears later on and has just one placement logic
16:59:11 <Cheibriados> New branch created: pull/789 (26 commits) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/pull/789
16:59:12 <Cheibriados> 03advil02 07https://github.com/crawl/crawl/pull/789 * 0.22-a0-369-g864ee37: Allow ghosts built from bones files to be placed in vaults 10(6 months ago, 7 files, 119+ 5-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/864ee3737e19
16:59:12 <Cheibriados> 03advil02 07https://github.com/crawl/crawl/pull/789 * 0.22-a0-370-gc5ebc23: Add some ghost mini-vaults that will place in Vaults 10(6 months ago, 1 file, 36+ 1-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/c5ebc234aa5c
16:59:12 <Cheibriados> 03advil02 07https://github.com/crawl/crawl/pull/789 * 0.22-a0-371-g9494f11: Add a description line for mirrored player ghosts 10(6 months ago, 5 files, 9+ 3-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/9494f11c4b11
16:59:12 <Cheibriados> 03advil02 07https://github.com/crawl/crawl/pull/789 * 0.22-a0-372-ge1cfe05: Add a permanent store for some fallback ghosts 10(6 months ago, 3 files, 197+ 99-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/e1cfe058fe32
16:59:12 <Cheibriados> 03advil02 07https://github.com/crawl/crawl/pull/789 * 0.22-a0-373-gf8544e0: Don't use permastore when rewriting on level veto 10(6 months ago, 1 file, 1+ 1-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/f8544e074de5
16:59:12 <Cheibriados> 03advil02 07https://github.com/crawl/crawl/pull/789 * 0.22-a0-374-g2cd10e7: Tweak ghost vault generation rates 10(6 months ago, 1 file, 6+ 6-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/2cd10e7afc61
16:59:12 <Cheibriados> 03advil02 07https://github.com/crawl/crawl/pull/789 * 0.22-a0-375-gff08da7: Don't spawn randomly-placed ghosts on level generation 10(6 months ago, 1 file, 0+ 2-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/ff08da74b210
16:59:12 <Cheibriados> 03advil02 07https://github.com/crawl/crawl/pull/789 * 0.22-a0-376-g958d761: Let ghosts use stairs 10(6 months ago, 1 file, 0+ 1-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/958d7619febf
16:59:12 <Cheibriados> 03advil02 07https://github.com/crawl/crawl/pull/789 * 0.22-a0-377-g3395f5e: Use CHANCE rather than WEIGHT for non-Vaults ghost vaults 10(6 months ago, 1 file, 4+ 4-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/3395f5e703be
16:59:12 <Cheibriados> 03advil02 07https://github.com/crawl/crawl/pull/789 * 0.22-a0-378-g30acc4a: Various vault adjustments based on feedback 10(4 months ago, 1 file, 35+ 26-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/30acc4a4f3b3
16:59:12 <Cheibriados> ... and 16 more commits
16:59:18 <muffindrake> I have three vaults done, one of which only appears in D10- and Depths, the other two depths only
16:59:32 <ebering> oh no what have i done
16:59:33 <muffindrake> two small ones and one large
16:59:48 <muffindrake> ebering: pls
16:59:59 <gammafunk> it's ok, I think it's because he based it on a branch
17:00:04 <gammafunk> so we got some spam, but nbd
17:00:09 <muffindrake> saved by the god, the ellipsis
17:00:53 <ebering> I think chei doesn't understand prs that target branches?
17:01:48 <gammafunk> well, it just shows the commits relative to master
17:01:59 <gammafunk> so when the pr is created, you'll see that
17:02:11 <gammafunk> but all subsequent commits I think will just show up by themselves
17:02:14 <muffindrake> Shouldn't you just PR to the fork instead, if you're building on top of that ghost vault pr?
17:02:56 <gammafunk> what does the fork mean in this context?
17:02:58 <muffindrake> Oh, wait
17:03:09 <muffindrake> I assumed the changes were in a separate repo, not merely a branch
17:03:12 <muffindrake> My mistake.
17:03:16 <gammafunk> his fork branch should be relative to crawl/spooky_vaults, yeah
17:03:42 <ebering> it is. chei just interprets everything relative to master I guess
17:04:10 <gammafunk> the spam will only be for the initial PR at least
17:04:30 <gammafunk> subsequent commits will just show up by themselves
17:07:22 <muffindrake> Are the only people who can push commits to the ghost vault PR those that have write access to the main repo?
17:14:06 <gammafunk> yes
17:14:16 <gammafunk> if you make a PR, you'll make a new one
17:14:26 <muffindrake> Aww
17:14:44 <muffindrake> and presumably there isn't any way to give write access on a branch basis either?
17:15:01 <gammafunk> we generally don't do that, no
17:15:03 <gammafunk> not sure why it would really be needed in this case
17:15:27 <gammafunk> a little chei spam is fine, you could however wait until branch gets merged
17:15:36 <gammafunk> then submit your PR relative to trunk
17:15:38 <muffindrake> It would somewhat reduce the amount of stray PRs, but fine
17:15:51 <gammafunk> yeah, stray prs aren't a concern
18:01:33 <muffindrake> ebering: Your first vault isn't calling ghost_vault_setup
18:20:47 <muffindrake> What would be a near approximation of a bar counter?
18:20:49 <Lantell> Unstable branch on underhound.eu updated to: 0.22-a0-480-g991dd4b2b4 (34)
18:21:03 <muffindrake> As in a tavern
18:21:23 <muffindrake> as a tile in the game
18:35:51 <ebering> muffindrake: oops thanks
18:55:16 <gammafunk> sadly there's no very good bar counter
18:55:26 <gammafunk> a bush is the closest thing that sort behaves like a bar
18:56:04 <muffindrake> Oh, good idea
19:07:13 <amalloy> where is the source for Cheibriados? i was interested in seeing how it produces PR notifications
19:08:14 <geekosaur> http://s-z.org/neil/git/cheibriados.git
19:16:43 <amalloy> yes, apparently each new branch created (including PR) gets commits announced based on master. it doesn't know there's another branch that already had many of these commits announced
19:17:39 <amalloy> my @revs = split /\n/, `git rev-list $head $exclude_old $exclude_master`;   ## where $exclude_old is empty for new PRs, and $exclude_master is "^master"
20:16:19 -!- amalloy is now known as amalloy_
20:39:42 -!- amalloy_ is now known as amalloy
20:50:47 -!- eb__ is now known as eb
23:59:35 <Eksell> Unstable branch on CRAWL.XTAHUA.COM updated to: 0.22-a0-480-g991dd4b (34)